With the amount of noise in the "social media" space, given all the social media "ninjas," "gurus" and "experts," it can be easy to miss some of the truly ground breaking-research. Over the past
couple of weeks, two reports on social media were released that I feel fall into the "can't miss" category if your job description includes understanding social media. Ironically, one of the reports
points out that every employee should understand how to engage in social media. So I guess that means everyone should read the reports. (:
The first must-read report was released by
Razorfish and is called "Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report." This focuses on how important social media is
to purchase decision-making, at all points in the purchase funnel. Razorfish asks the right questions of consumers, and is able to demonstrate that even though people claim they don't "turn to social
media to make purchase decisions," social media certainly heavily influences purchase decisions. The study provides some great data to back up the argument I made in "Report Claims Social Media Fails As Marketing Medium -- I Claim Bullshit" -- that a prior report
claiming social media is a poor marketing medium was asking entirely the wrong questions.
advertisement
advertisement
In my view, here are a few keys points from the Razorfish report:
Marketers must
understand that the ability to deliver message through "known peer influencers" is the single most powerful tool social media can provide a brand. As the report states, "Consumers look
to brands to help them connect." Brands should not shy away from this responsibility, but rather embrace it, which leads to the next point...Social ads as the future of social
influence marketing. From the report: "...infusing social content and a user's social graph directly into the ad unit itself. Now, advertisers can build social features into ad units." For more on my
view, read: "Ad Creative That Works For Social Media."The Social Influence
Marketing Score, or SIM Score, could prove to be a very valuable tool in brands' ability to recognize the ROI on social media efforts. I believe that in the end, the value in the score will depend
heavily on its adoption and usage as a currency and measurement tool. Brands need more common metrics in the social space, and it would be great if the SIM Score could help fill that need.Of course, it gives me unbridled pleasure that Razorfish's report includes a section titled: "Viral Marketing Through Social: No Free Lunch," which helps dispel the myth that social media makes
all media become free media. The other can't-miss report recently released was put out by Charlene Li and Wetpaint. The report is titled "Engagement: Ranking The Top 100 Global Brands."
While there is a lot of back and forth over the term engagement as a metric, this study takes a more holistic view of how "engaged" brands are with their consumers over various social media channels.
I won't get into more details here, but I can't help but give you the tease that will have you printing out this report right away. From LI's blog: "These Mavens on average grew 18% in revenues over the last 12 months, compared to the least engaged companies who on average
saw a decline of 6% in revenue during the same period. The same holds true for two other financial metrics, gross margin and net profit. Note that we are not claiming a causal relationship -- but
there is clearly a correlation and connection."
I highly suggest reading both of these studies if your job involves social media in any way, especially if you want to be a social media
ninja, expert or guru someday! What gets me excited about the level of detail and process that went into these studies is that we are seeing the social media industry grow up right in front of our
eyes -- noving from an experimental playground, to a necessary part of business, and specifically of the marketing mix.
Drop me a line and let me know what you think and continue the
conversation on the Spin blog or on Twitter at www.twitter.com/joemarchese.