Reflecting back on the 2009 holiday season, I received an unprecedented surge in two types of holiday cards from industry colleagues and other acquaintances: mass e-cards and mass-printed cards with
no handwriting (not even a signature). Meanwhile, the volume of handcrafted, personalized cards and letters has dropped significantly. This is a radical shift from the past, so I thought I'd
unpack this a bit:
E-cards: They can be delightful, and they're a great environment-friendly alternative to paper. Just like any other card, they're only meaningful if
meaningful effort went into producing them. What makes a meaningful e-card? Personal expression, customization, first-person video, pictures and a link to a central place where recipients can reply
(the more communal and open, the better). For those feeling guilty of not sending a paper card via snail mail, I like the concept of an e-card with an associated charitable donation. To be sure,
e-cards suck if they're simply a scan or rendering of a traditional printed card, with no personalization. E-mail spam filters tend to flag them, anyway.
advertisement
advertisement
Mass-Printed
Cards: These are acceptable only if you personalize them in some fashion. A personalized note is preferred, though initials are a minimum. But it's not good to send a mass-printed card
with no human marks. That is most often forgettable, and sometimes insulting. It's OK if someone is a single record in your database, but most would prefer you spare the trees and carbon
emissions of land delivery versus sending a mass-printed card with no human touch. It would be better to send an e-card, even a spammy one, which can be deleted easily!
Handcrafted
Cards: These are the best kind, and you don't even need a card; even a napkin can have tremendous impact. Similar to e-cards and other communications, personal expression and
customization create success. We need more handcrafted cards and, even better, handwritten letters.
What kind of holiday cards work best for you?