This weekend, I was struck by how intense this perspective can be, as a new friend was describing a former large-scale venture in which she was passionately involved. Her initiative of yesteryear combined open source content authorship; production and distribution; progressive compensation models for creators; social platforms; and innovative monetization structures. It was downright cool. Or rather, as someone at the table said, "This was truly before its time."
And it was. In fact, the time would be, could be now -- for this particular venture. Now that the environment has started to truly open up for original content production and global Internet distribution; now that we've great tolerance and curiosity in the sphere for new journalism models. But this venture has long since been shelved, and all vision-keepers have left the building. So now what?
advertisement
advertisement
Following this chat, I found myself thinking about the concept of "being before one's time." It's rare that we dub something or someone such at the time. It's so often a look back, once the context and the history are clear. On this theme, I remember hearing tales of my grandmother bullying her school administrators to allow her to try out for the football team as a girl, around the 1920s. The family celebrates this fact of her life, but it's an isolated point, as she never went on to a life of athleticism. It's a reference point.
In our world, what's before one's time may be a particular business venture; an invention; being an early-mover on a probable trend; or opting out of a popular opinion. I recall friends' and industry lightning rods' early adventures in a random list:
- IPTV
- Streaming media "in a box"
- Citizen journalism
- Premium paid content models
- Touch-screen kiosks
- File-sharing
- Cross-media analysis
Designating something before its time implies a stalling out, a partial or full failure -- but it also acknowledges a core value, sometimes a diamond inside that may seed a future trend or serious market development. Of course, it's often under the guiding light of another force or at the hand of another player that the not-so-new thing restarts and takes flight. This happens when conditions are better, the market more conducive, social acceptance more likely.
True enough: where would we be today if we failed to eventually appreciate the significance of hypertext documents, Internet communications and email; instant messaging; or VoIP? Or if we failed to persist with early forms of social media like list-servs, message boards and chat rooms? What if no one ever took a stab at monetizing the search marketplace? What if no one sought to raise the bar on measurement and standardization across media? What if Open Source never happened? Cloud computing?
I suppose the things that are supposed to stall or fail, do, and those that must succeed, eventually will -- even if reconstituted from earlier efforts. The big picture leaves the emotionality out of it, and looks to evolution. On a sentimental note, the only sad part of being before one's time is that one may not be a direct part of the comeback, if a comeback unfolds. But, for those paying attention to the look-back: The people, ideas and things that seem to matter in hindsight, quietly, actually, did mean something at the time, no matter how small the measure.
Recovering from the pain of being "before one's time" requires exceptional discipline when you sort out tactics from strategy.
Paid search is a good example. I remember when there were about 10 players offering search tools for web users but nobody had a monetization strategy that was interesting. Getting advertisers interested in small text ads next to relevant searches was like banging your head against a tree. Google came into this mess convinced that everybody else had just been too early to the space. They had the same strategy everyone else did but their tactics were totally different. The rest is history.
Being "ahead of one's time" often causes the visionary to conceive of an idea that does not fully leverage where technology will be five years down the road. As the technology improves, the original player in the space stays too wedded to the tactics they adopted. It is hard to tell your investors that you are throwing away their investment in an executional solution that is now obsolete. The idea is still good but the solution is old.
Heck, we still have a lot of people in this industry who think that the purpose of display advertising is to drive traffic to a website. They remain wedded to a dial-up tactic (clicks) for display advertising even though they are operating in a broadband world where the tactic should be distributed content into the display ad unit.
Kendall's post is insightful and thought-provoking. Being a visionary doesn't always involve technology, it can involve ideas that are ahead of their time. And being "before one's time" has had some painful results if we look throughout history.
The post touched me personally I have been told that.
I learned that being first can be beneficial--- or not. A point I would add: those who were inspired by the visionaries would do well to acknowledge them.
Keen insight. I thoroughly enjoyed this, having always been an early adopter / first mover - sometimes seeing success having put myself in the right place, but sometimes seeing failure by banking on the ability to influence or accelerate evolution - in particular the evolution of the consumer. I think what would be an interesting follow up would be advice to professionals who have moved with the changes in the industry and been among the first to see the value in new approaches, how they can make those owning the purse strings see the value in that. I attempt to strike this balance frequently so would be interested in seeing those thoughts.
There are more examples of being before its time throughout history. But for some odd reason, The Three Stooges and Rocky and Bullwinkle came to mind first. ;)
Being before one's time means you did not clearly understand the problem you were solving, or you failed to solve it completely enough to have buyers be willing to pay you to solve it.
Mark Allen Roberts
www.nosmokeandmirrors.com