Specifically, the study found that over the past three years, the number of readers-per-copy has risen 7.5%, to 3.30 adults in 2009 from 3.07 adults in 2007.
The finding is significant for several reasons. One obviously is that it shows that the average copy of a newspaper is getting more mileage as it is passed from one reader to another.
Another reason why it's significant, is that readers-per-copy is an important advertising metric, showing advertisers and agencies how much bang they got for each copy of a newspaper they paid for - and it's on the rise, not the decline.
advertisement
advertisement
"Readers?per?copy is especially important as newspapers compete for their share of a brand's media budget, particularly among national advertisers," states Gary Meo, senior vice president, print and digital media services, Scarborough Research. "More people are reading each printed copy, further enhancing the value of the newspaper as an advertising medium, and increasing exposure for advertisers."
Jason Klein, the president-CEO of the NNN says the finding also indicates that newspapers appear to be running their operations more efficiently, and are getting a higher return on their print operations by reaching more readers per single copy of their print editions, while at the same time, extending their reach via online readership.
Does anybody take rpc numbers as much more than a popularity measure? I've always taken them with large doses of salt...
It makes sense. People are reading the office copy or a friend's rather than buy their own newspaper because of the steady price increase. The daily jumped from $.50 to $1.00 in Dallas, while Sunday's edition quickly went from $1.50 to $3.00
I have to agree with the statement about cost. I'm fortunate that Curry College makes available both the New York Times and USA Today...and I DO see my students reading the paper more.
The bigger question is..."Is the news that I'm reading relevant?" The Globe's "Metro" section is shrinking while its national coverage...in large part a regurgitation of what appears in parent New York Times (including obituaries!)...is less and less relevant.
The challenge for newspapers is to provide "gotta read" news! And, no, that doesn't include every shooting and housefire in the region.