Zynga Deal Highlights Facebook's Vulnerability

zuckerbergSometimes success tells you as much about a company's weaknesses as its strengths. This is the case with Facebook's recent deal with Zynga Game Network Inc.

According to one view Facebook can do whatever it pleases -- including controversial moves to share member information and fiddle with privacy policies -- because of its overwhelming popularity, which gives it a dominant position among online social networks. Reinforced by a continual chorus of media reports about the site, this widespread view has become a self-fulfilling prophecy, giving Facebook what I would call a "mindshare monopoly" (when's the last time you heard about MySpace?) and a great deal of momentum as a result.

However, events like the Zynga deal -- or more specifically, the negotiations leading up to the Zynga deal -- reveal how fragile and precarious Facebook's supposedly dominant position really is.

The last couple weeks saw Zynga, which operates popular casual games on Facebook including Farmville and Mafia Wars, assuming a surprisingly tough negotiating position in its talks with Facebook about the terms of their continuing partnership. Basically, Zynga objected to Facebook's plans to take a sizeable cut of Zynga's sales in Facebook's new virtual currency, and countered by threatening to take its games off Facebook. Although the negotiations finally ended with a deal keeping Zynga games on Facebook for five more years, the terms of the deal weren't disclosed, and Zynga almost certainly got more favorable terms than other developers using Facebook's virtual currency for e-commerce on the site.

This would appear to be a case of the tail wagging the dog. According to conventional wisdom, Facebook -- the colossus of online social networking -- should be able to charge premium tolls for access to its huge user base. Indeed, Zynga makes most of its money on sales of virtual goods on Facebook, and it wouldn't necessarily be a simple matter to migrate players to other Web destinations. But Facebook caved, suggesting a very different dynamic is actually at work.

Even though Zynga is dependent on Facebook as its current online host, in reality Zynga is holding all the cards because of the popularity of its games: essentially, Zynga brings more user engagement to Facebook than Facebook brings to Zynga. And this, in turn, points to Facebook's broader underlying vulnerability. If a couple simple online games (which didn't even exist until July 2007) now account for so much of Facebook's popularity, how much unique value does the rest of the site really offer users? Meaning, what features and functions does Facebook offer members, on its own, that can't be potentially duplicated elsewhere or eventually moved off-site by a partner like Zynga, should relationships sour?

After all, Facebook doesn't have a copyright on the basic model of the online social network, and many of the specific forms and functions it created for networking could probably be recreated without too much trouble and without copyright infringement. Meanwhile the pressure to monetize forces it to risk driving off partners like Zynga which now account for a large part of its popularity (not to mention members concerned about privacy issues).

1 comment about "Zynga Deal Highlights Facebook's Vulnerability".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Kelly Monroe from Brief Attention Span, May 25, 2010 at 9:41 a.m.

    As an IT consultant I am fully aware that IT management is struggling with whether social media is productive or obstructive for companies and their employees. Software is being developed and policy and restrictions are being decided everyday by IT managers. The security of company networks are at stake but the potential for innovation using social media is a large enough carrot for the discussion of how to properly utilize the medium continues. Palo Alto networks came up with an webinar,, that should be interesting exploring the issues surrounding social media in the workplace. It is important to not only understand the immediate benefits of doing business how one lives, but the threat it presents to a company's greater ROI and productivity when it comes to the server's safety and security.

Next story loading loading..