
Instant feedback. Instant gratification. Instant results. You'll find in Google Instant many of the gratifications social media brings, though you have probably heard enough on the topic.
Well here's one more. Call it what you want, but Google Instant plays on the short attention span humans have developed, not to mention lack of
patience, and unwillingness to dig for information in the mounds to which the Internet provides access. Not a bad thing and certainly helpful. The search feature fits nicely into today's society for
instant gratification. But who wins and who loses?
Google Instant affects search behavior. The ability for Google to predict the topic it changes the keyword and terms people
search on to find the same subject. Although Google provides personalized search results through Google Instant, type in "mortg" and searchers immediately begin to see search results for "mortgage
calculator," rather than mortgage lenders. It's clear that "mortgage calculator" cannibalizes some "mortgage" search traffic.
In a way, Google Instant manipulated the behavior of the
person searching for a mortgage lender. SEO professionals, along with those who support paid search, will need to take this into consideration when designing search campaigns. Finding a useful tool
like a mortgage calculator might sidetrack someone from their original search, but it could become helpful to the person searching for estimates on payments and loan types for which they might
qualify.
In the first few days after Google switched on Google Instant, ecommerce companies across the board supported by Covario experienced a 15% drop in traffic from organic search.
Covario supports many high-profile companies in the electronics industry. Traditionally ecommerce relies more on long-tail keyword to monetize natural search traffic, whereas the brand tends to focus
on the head by relying on fewer and more popular keyword terms.
Covario Senior Search Manager Jeff MacGurn suggests one possible theory for the dip points to Google Instant possibly
steering searchers away from the long tail, changing search behavior ever so slightly. He says Google's feature could cannibalize long-tail search keyword terms in favor of head terms.
The
15% drop seems to have rebounded a bit in the last week. "We're still not sure if it's because of the timing (post labor day seasonal trend) or if it's because of Google Instant," MacGurn says. "The
rebound would seem to indicate that it might be more of a seasonal trend than Google Instant, but without more data it's difficult to isolate the fact that would allow us to come to more of a concrete
conclusion."
Continuing to track progress, MacGurn says it seems as if Google Instant favors research-based interactive search phrases. He calls it the "airline affect, you pay more to get
less." It could potentially cost brands more money to optimize sites because predictive results push down other results belonging to brands.
While it's clear that Google Instant leads
searches to terms they might not have otherwise explored, Mashable asked readers to take a poll and cast
a vote for Google Instant or regular old Google. In the Mashable poll, Google Instant took 50.84% of the votes. Regular Google took 37.56% of the votes. And, 11.61% of the people had no opinion.
Lend your voice. What do you think?
I guess it depends on who you ask and the type of business optimizing the site whether you like one or
the other. In a research note to investors, Benchmark Capital Analyst Clayton Moran explains results on Google Instant so far indicate greater traffic to trademark terms
and other category or head terms.
A white paper from The Search Agency reminds us that the core features of Google Instant include:
1) Dynamic Results - Google
dynamically displays relevant search results as you type so you can quickly interact and click through to the web content you need.
2) Predictions - One of the key
technologies in Google Instant is the prediction of the rest of your query (in light gray text) before you finish typing.
3) Scroll to Search - Scroll through predictions
and see results instantly for each as user.
The white paper, which analyzes the impact of Google Instant on SEM and SEO campaigns, explains how Google
Instant might affect a search marketer's job. It explains that the increase of impression volume will become the most obvious because a new search results page appears with every keystroke. An
impression now gets counted after three seconds, clicks on "search." The three-second rule could have a negative impact on click-through rate, particularly for high-traffic keywords.
The
paper confirms that for organic search, Google Instant does not mean the death of SEO, as some have written, but it could make optimization more difficult for advertisers targeting long-tail traffic.