Among social networking sites, Facebook is by far the most preferred service for sharing, making up more
than 78% of usage, according to SocialTwist.
Bigger picture, social networking sites saw a 10% increase in usage, and a 16% bump in click-throughs in the last year. To put that number
into perspective, email still accounts for 55% of referrals.
As Twitter shows, however, social networking sites are far more effective when it comes to click-throughs -- accounting for
more than 60% of the market share.
Since debuting its highly-anticipated ad products in April, Twitter has signed over 30 top brands, including Coca-Cola, Virgin America and Starbucks.
Yet, as The Wall Street Journal reported late last month, reviews have been mixed. Regarding Twitter's ad products, Universal McCann EVP David Cohen told The Journal: "The jury is out."
In an interview
with The New York Times, Twitter's newly appointed CEO Dick Costolo said the company would have more than 100
advertisers by the end of the year.
What's more, "According to Twitter, on average 5 percent of people who see Promoted Tweets are clicking on, replying to or forwarding the ads
-- much higher than the less than 1 percent of people who click on a typical display ad," reports The Times.
Thought bullish on Twitter, Curt Hecht, chief executive of VivaKi Nerve
Center, tells The Times that one reason so many people are clicking on Twitter ads might be the initial novelty.
As ad execs tell The Times, meanwhile, another issue for Twitter is that
its free services are presently enough to keep clients happy.
"Every one of our clients has Twitter as a part of their social media strategy, but at the moment we're not seeing a
tremendous amount of interest in the specific packages that Twitter is offering," Aaron Shapiro, a partner at Interpublic's Huge, tells The Times.
Of course there is more clicking-through on Twitter. It's a shorthand low-info form of communicating, where you have to click links (sites, photos, etc.) all the time to accomplish anything. Facebook, on the other hand, shows everything at once, so users get in the habit of scrolling, with very little need to click. So ads may indeed be getting clicked less -- because everything is getting clicked less.
Good for Twitter. If I had interactive ads to run, I might want Facebook's bigger tent at first, but I'd probably opt for the site where users are more accustomed to clicking-through. What good is a larger number of target customers who are less likely to click-through?