Commentary

More PR BS

Ad Age Blogs this week saw fit to allow Rosanna M. Fiske, chair and CEO of the Public Relations Society of America, to expend 508 words on "In PR, Measurement Moves From Fuzzy Math and Social-Media Snake Oil to Actual Metrics." "AH HA," says I, who have followed this circumloquacious discussion for more than 35 years, "Finally, some guidance on how to TRULY calculate the ROI of PR."  But no. Nothing new from her or the seven items she linked to. Rather than provide a solution, there were just more "we should's" and "somebody oughtta's."

It was, in fact, a delicious example of PR speak, where someone expends a significant effort, tops it with a provocative headline, and then says nothing worth hearing -- something that nearly all reporters feel most news releases are guilty of.

The PR industry is tripping all over itself to use social media to further annoy reporters, since scribes by and large have stopped answering phones or responding to email pitches. Or PR imagines that it can now "bypass" the media and reach client target audiences directly on Twitter and Facebook. Yet the flag still really goes up when they deliver on the traditional promise of PR: a nice story in a good publication. Don't get me started on all the other nonsense PR wants to claim credit for, like "shifts in awareness, comprehension, attitude and behavior related to purchase, donations, brand equity, corporate reputation, employee engagement, public policy, investment decisions..."  Yeah, and don't forget making sure the CEO's tuxedo is pressed before he speaks tonight.

advertisement

advertisement

Over the years I have seen dozens of "formulas" to calculate PR success. Most of them were simply bullshit; nicely packaged, but BS nonetheless.  There seemed to be a focus more on appearance rather than substance (hey, kinda like how most people regard PR anyway).

Here is a really easy way to measure your PR success. It doesn't neatly fit into some prefabricated formula or even give you a way to measure the ROI on your PR spend, but here goes anyway:  When a nice story about you appears in a good publication, a couple of things should happen. Your phone should start to ring and your inbox fill up with queries from prospects who never knew you had the capabilities covered in the story. In a perfect world, some of them convert. Your friends will tell you they saw the story and pat you on the back. Your enemies will call their PR folks in and yell at them that this story was about you instead of them. At a cocktail party, someone will say, “Yeah, I read that about you the other day, can't recall where, but yeah I saw a story." Your VCs will be happy for about 24 hours, since they think that good press will lead to an earlier, more profitable outcome for them.  Another reporter might see that story and mentally put you on their call list for a similar or different story in the future. You can make your folks tweet it or put it on the company blog, assuming that it will have some sort of multiplier effect. You will feel better about paying the PR firm's invoice at the end of the month.

And that is pretty much that. Put together a string of good stories in good publications, and suddenly someone wants to acquire you. Then you will see the true ROI of your PR.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 comments about "More PR BS".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Len Stein from Visibility Public Relations, October 28, 2011 at 10:58 a.m.

    Right on Target! That old voodoo measurement jive alive and well... You forgot the importance of having the client's name spelled correctly, and ironing that tux ain't a bad idea.

  2. Gerard Corbett from Public Relations Society of America, October 29, 2011 at 9:05 a.m.

    While I appreciate your perspective, it’s unfortunate you espouse an outdated and derisive viewpoint of PR's role and value.

    Talk about lack of measurement ... your strategy of “put[ting] together a string of good stories in good publications … suddenly someone wants to acquire [your company]” is oversimplistic. That may have worked 20 years ago, but in today’s marketplace, it will likely deliver only in a 24-hour news cycle, but little else.

    You also claim that my commentary in AdAge contained a lot of “we should’s” and “somebody oughtta’s.” Yet you fail to mention (despite the fact it was pointed out in the AdAge piece) that many groups, including the Public Relations Society of America, are actively collaborating to establish and put into practice realistic and objective global measurement standards and protocols.

    Furthermore, you conveniently fail to mention that it is not all that simple to measure the ROI of PR. The metrics must account for a variety of factors, including a campaign’s impact on customer sentiment, sales, brand affinity and reputation. None of these fit into a neat little box or formula (and most certainly not the very outdated Advertising Value Equivalent model), nor can accurate ROI be measured merely by getting a client’s name in multiple media stories. That's simply media relations -- one of the many elements that are part of PR.

    We are in agreement on one point, however: Talk is good; solutions and answers are better.

    So here is one possible solution, advanced by AMEC: the Valid Metrics guidelines. Currently in draft form, these guidelines comprise a matrix that ties various communications and marketing strategies and tactics to a change in behavior, measured over time. More info on the Valid Metrics guidelines is here: http://bit.ly/iFP690

    Additionally, delegates to the recently held European Summit on Measurement, which PRSA participated in, voted on four top measurement priorities for the coming year:

    1. How to measure the return on investment (ROI) of public relations.

    2. Create and adopt global standards for social media measurement.

    3. Measurement of PR campaigns and programs needs to become an intrinsic part of the PR toolkit.

    4. Institute a client education program such that clients insist on measurement of outputs, outcomes and business results from PR programs.

    Clearly, there is more work that needs to be done. But outdated viewpoints only serve to take the profession backwards, rather than adding to the robust dialogue that is needed to advance the industry forward. For example, your comment on the PR industry's efforts in leading social media are also outdated, as confirmed through recent research, reported by eMarketer: http://bit.ly/gYRcA2

    Rosanna Fiske
    PRSA Chair and CEO

  3. George Simpson from George H. Simpson Communications, October 31, 2011 at 9:42 a.m.

    Keep fighting the good fight. Meanwhile, I will keep getting those stories for my clients. G

Next story loading loading..
About the Author

, President, George H. Simpson Communications