An antitrust lawsuit by two porn companies against Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers about the forthcoming “.xxx” domain names has drawn the
attention of the Association of National Advertisers, which says the case raises some of the same issues about new domain names that trouble marketers.
The lawsuit, filed by Manwin Licensing
and Digital Playground, is just “one more example of many potential problems that would be multiplied by hundreds” should ICANN go ahead with its controversial plan to allow companies to
purchase brand names and other words as top-level domains.
A top-level domain is the string of letters to the right of the last dot in the URL. ICANN intends to accept applications between
Jan. 12 and April 12 of next year.
The ANA opposes the plan, arguing that companies would have to pay hefty fees for “defensive” registration -- that is, registrations of their own
names in order to prevent them from getting scooped up by others. Registering a new top-level domain costs at least $185,000 and operating it costs $25,000 a year.
Companies with trademarked
names have the ability to stop their names from being used in URLs, but even those companies could end up paying large sums for monitoring.
The lawsuit by Luxembourg-based Manwin and Digital
Playground, of Van Nuys, Calif., touches on some of those points, though their case deals with the narrow issue of the “xxx” top-level domain. That domain was approved by ICANN in March
and is slated to roll out next month.
Companies can pay to block anyone else from registering their names with an .xxx at the end, but doing so costs an average of $150 -- which the Manwin and
Digital Playground say is artificially high.
They allege that a host of businesses, celebrities and others will have an incentive to pay to block their names from the “xxx” domain,
in order to prevent confusion. “Owners of names not associated with adult content need to prevent the names' use in .xxx in order to avoid an undesirable association,” Manwin and Digital
Playground argue in the complaint, filed in federal court in Los Angeles.
“For example, prominent celebrities may wish to avoid .xxx Web sites under their names. Owners of children's
character names may wish to bar registration of such names in .xxx to prevent any resulting adult or sexual connotation to the character. Those owning names already associated with adult content also
have a particularly acute need to defensively register in .xxx.”
Manwin and Digital Playground allege that ICANN and the registry ICM (which is registering the new names) engaged in
price gouging and other “anti-competitive and unfair practices.” They “conspired, intentionally agreed, and intended to eliminate competitive bidding and competition ... and to
create illegal monopolies,” the lawsuit alleges.
The companies are seeking an injunction banning ICANN and ICM from going ahead with the planned rollout, as well as “reasonable
price constraints and service requirements on permanent blocking services.”