I read an interesting blog by
NextMark’s Chris O’Hara on the Econsultancy Web site that spoke glowingly about monitoring consumers' facial expressions while watching advertisements, an effort being
undetaken by a company calle Affectiva.
Measuring emotional and facial responses to advertising isn’t new, but the ability to do it as well as it can be done now is an important
change.
Affectiva uses Webcams to watch people as they consume video, and measure their response. This is something akin to a modern focus group but without the big phony mirror behind
which all the marketing executives sit to watch participants talk candidly about products. There’s certainly something to be learned by studying faces and hearing comments in real time.
I've had great times at focus groups. At their best it's a lot like opening up someone else's mail.
About Affectiva, O'Hara writes, “Now, marketers could see the exact moment when
they captured surprise, delight, or revulsion in a consumer.”
I still tend to be dubious about the ultimate value of what real good measuring emotional and facial response will do.
O’Hara’s blog says that at a recent 4As conference, Allison Arlin-Giorgi from The Intelligence Group reported that according to research, Generation Y consumers find humor to be the best
way to sell something. Unilever supposedly took this information and ordered “one more smile” in every 30-second spot. (I would so love to see that memo.)
But really. It
is easy for me to understand that a smiling, laughing reaction to an advertisement might make me feel good about the advertiser, I have a harder time believing it does much more than soften me up.
Even if I am in the market for product that funny Brand Y makes, I don’t think my good attitude about their commercial extends to my decision to buy the product. It does buy a consideration and
in a brand-eat-brand world, that’s worth something. So, really, I'll stay neutral. A lot of pieces of information usually add up.
Still monitoring my smiles and frowns, my ups and downs
(thanks to “My Fair Lady” right there) is really spending a lot more time and effort than is necessary. Just create a witty commercial –witty is a little elastic but you
don’t need technology to define it.
At MediaPost’s Video Insider Summit over the weekend, I was speaking with one attendee over dinner and remarking how pre-roll, as opposed
to a TV commercial, has to grab—that is, really embrace—a consumer within a few seconds, or that viewer is just gone. It’s not like TV commercials are afforded all day to get going
but her point is observable and fixable and does have lead to a much more practical goal—people see the ad—than how many times they smile while it airs. Online video advertising can
be entertaining but it isn’t in the entertainment business.
pj@mediapost.com