advertisement
advertisement
DISHING IT - We were just re-reading - as we often do - a press release on a major media account shift, when we realized it was treated as a minor part of the announcement. The release, which DirecTV put out last Thursday to explain the sudden shift of its account from MediaVest (media) and Deutsch (creative) to OMD and BBDO. But you never would have noticed the media reassignment based on the headline, which appeared "above the fold" on the electronic newswires. In 15.5 point type, it read: "DIRECTV Shifts Creative Responsibilities to BBDO New York." Below that the dateline and below that - in 12 point type that ran "below-the-fold" was the kicker: "Media Assigned to OMD as Entire Account Consolidates Within Omnicom Shops." Clearly, this is a client that treats the importance of media service as an afterthought. Weird, considering they're a media company. But not-so-weird, when you consider that they're a media concern that's essentially indifferent - for the moment anyway - to Madison Avenue. In other words, they don't pitch advertising inventory. Still, you'd think that where their own advertising services were concerned, they'd recognize the true importance of media - from an economic point-of-view, if not a strategic one. The last time we counted, on a $100 million account like DirecTV's, $85 million went to media, with about $15 million divvied up between the creative shop, the media shop - assorted subcontractors - and possibly some being rebated back to the client, depending on the compensation agreement.