Specifically, the screen during these breaks was sectioned into three parts: A large box sitting top left that featured an actual commercial, a brightly colored border that ran along the bottom of that box and up its right side with the logo of the advertiser (and sometimes the actual product) prominently displayed within it, and most interestingly, a smaller box at top right that offered a live feed from the “Idol” environs during the break.
It was an immediate eye-catcher, perhaps because it was something new -- but I think Fox is onto something here. For one thing, staring at the very prominent advertiser logos made as much of an impression on me as watching the commercial in the left box. I recall CBS' Leslie Moonves once telling me that he thought if advertiser logos were prominently displayed during commercials they would register with viewers who were watching recorded shows on their DVRs and speeding through commercial breaks. I think Fox last night proved him right.
Yes, there was a lot happening on the screen during the commercials in these two pods -- especially during the Coca-Cola spot, which at one point divided the box on the left into three boxes and the brightly colored border into two, resulting in six simultaneous images. But there was never any sense of clutter or confusion. Instead, everything about the advertisers' messages was excitingly enhanced. Coca-Cola actually entertained me for a few moments.
It might have been a lot to follow for old folks, but isn't stimulation from multiple sources the norm for Millennials when they are watching their many screens?
Overall, I think Fox created the most exciting environment for commercial showcasing that I have ever seen. As Coca-Cola and others demonstrated, there is much that an advertiser can do with this format to maximize its messages. If there was a drawback to this bold new presentation, it was that subsequent “traditional” commercial breaks in the show seemed drab and uninteresting by comparison.
At first I thought the live feed box thing would get old in about three seconds, but I was wrong. Consider what viewers saw in the two that were included in Wednesday's show. In the first, they got to see all the hustle and bustle that takes place on the stage when the cameras are off during live competition shows. The judges were buffed and polished by hair and makeup artists. A stage hand busily swept contestant dander off the stage floor. (Or was he mopping contestant sweat? It was tough to tell.) Host Ryan Seacrest scampered over to chat with judges Keith Urban, Jennifer Lopez and Harry Connick Jr. Mentor Randy Jackson left his seat in the audience and came down to dish with them as well. Connick got up and stretched. Various producers and technicians dashed about. Urban diligently studied his notes. Words Seacrest would eventually speak flashed on the teleprompter behind the judges' table. Two cans of hairspray were emptied onto Lopez's head. (Okay, I'm exaggerating. But a note about that: The hairspray seemed to be of the aerosol variety. Seriously, the emissions from those two cans formed quite the cloud. I thought News Corp. was a green company. Shouldn't the “Idol” judge be spritzed or gelled rather than sprayed? Or was this naturally sourced aerosol? Just asking.)
In the second split-screen pod, Urban was busily texting someone, the hair and makeup people returned (this time paying special attention to every hair on Urban's head), Lopez took a long sip of something from a cup other than the one with the Coca-Cola logo in front of her, and Connick was showing something on his mobile device to Lopez. Then the action cut to the holding pen backstage where the guys who had not yet learned their fate nervously chatted, wiped the sweat from their faces, waved to the camera and moved about, hoping to be noticed. The action cut again to the guys and girls out front who had already been picked for the finals, looking as happy as can be.
If Fox doesn't stick with this new format I'm going to be disappointed. As someone who doesn't mind sitting through commercial pods during a live competition show, it was nice to see a network try to offer me something for my efforts. And it brought new life to the “Idol” experience, as well.
I will admit, the Seacrest prompt that "we're going to stay with you live during this break" kept me from using my skip button for one of the breaks during the Wednesday show. But after watching the top left box for about 20 seconds to see what was up, I went ahead and skipped through the rest of the break. Just to be clear, I'm not FF. My remote control has a 30-second skip button which I use very skillfully. I thought 8 clicks was excessive (4 minute pod) but now I'm encountering 10 click (5 minute) pods. How can someone without a DVR even watch TV anymore? I don't start watching a 2 hour show until it's been recording for 40 minutes and I still catch the end live. C'mon man.
CBS This Morning has been doing it for quite a while, running an ad on half the screen while the local temps and forecasts scroll down the other half.
I guess it shows the difference in exposure between Prime time Idol and early AM CBS news. I find it funny that Les Moonves concept was so smoothly executed by Fox. This is our future, we better get used to it. If done right this viewer engagement during commercial pods can be a bonus for both parties besides a recipe for survival for the traditional 30, 60 and 10 second commercials.
This is just another tactic in the continuing battle to maintain viewer engagement. The show isn't broadcast live, but this is intended to make it feel that way, and bring the viewing audience closer to the experience of the studio audience.
Clever, and maybe effective, as long as advertisers don't balk at paying for the distracting multiple subject format and smaller viewing area.