Commentary

On 'Homeland,' The War On Terror Drones On

On TV, as in real life, the War on Terror is a never-ending battle.

With all due respect to the thousands of Americans working in our military and intelligence services waging this war in the real world every day, a television viewer can be excused for experiencing battle fatigue, especially when reflecting on all the War on Terror TV shows we’ve absorbed over the past dozen or more years.

“Homeland” is one of them, of course, and its return this past weekend on Showtime for Season No. 4 has me wondering if I have the stomach for another go-round of this.

It’s not that there is anything particularly wrong with “Homeland.”  It is a fine show with great performances in realistic settings ranging from the Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C. to the teeming cities of south Asia. So far this season, the cities being depicted in that region are Kabul, Afghanistan, and Islamabad, Pakistan.

advertisement

advertisement

In the two episodes seen so far -- both of which were shown on premiere night on Sunday -- Islamabad is where the action is this season. It’s where our beleaguered heroine Carrie Mathison (Claire Danes) is now working out of the besieged American embassy building.

The scenes set in the Pakistani capital (whether filmed there or not) are filled with the ambience we’ve come to expect from such shows -- the streets only partially paved and strewn with trash, the crumbling curbs and buildings, the dense and haphazard traffic of two-, three-, and four-wheeled vehicles, the swarthy populations crowding into marketplaces and bazaars.

Whether in Pakistan, Virginia or Washington, spies are everywhere. Someone is always following someone else, or preparing a double-cross, or working at cross purposes. At the center of all the intrigue is a painstaking twofold effort aimed at identifying terror plots in their formative stages that are still preventable; and learning the locations of wanted terrorists so they can be blasted to smithereens with guided missiles launched from unmanned drones or manned aircraft.

It’s the latter effort to locate terrorists that forms the basis for the main storyline in the new “Homeland” season as an airstrike OK’d by Carrie leads to a missile attack on a Pakistani wedding that kills a dozen or more innocents. The question that arises is the same one that has arisen throughout this show’s run: How will the responsibilities and stresses associated with her job affect Carrie, who has never been quite right mentally from the get-go?

Over the last three seasons, I often wondered how on earth she remained in the employ of the Central Intelligence Agency since her behavior has so often been irregular, to say the least.  Yes, she’s been drummed into and out of the agency over the years -- but here she is again this season, very much a part of things, in a leadership position.  Go figure.

So where does the “fatigue” come from? Basically, from the intensity and the longevity of the TV version of the War on Terror.  TV viewers have been living through these fictional but realistic battles with terror cells both foreign and domestic practically since the original 9/11, starting with “24,” which premiered on Nov. 6, 2001. 

Since then, numerous terror-fighting shows have come and gone -- most of them short-lived but fundamentally the same -- all depicting government agencies and their personnel applying high technology to tracking the movements of terrorists around the world, sometimes succeeding and sometimes not.

Extreme violence has been part of the intensity of these shows -- something “24” became especially known for. Even more than the violence, however, is the seeming futility of the fight. As in real life, TV’s War on Terror only seems to beget more enemies, not fewer.

And so, with so many enemies proliferating everywhere, the fictional War on Terror continues, with TV about to introduce yet another terror-fighting drama series -- “State of Affairs” on NBC, starring Katherine Heigl as a swashbuckling CIA operative in the Carrie Mathison mold.

Coming in November, “State of Affairs” will premiere 13 years after “24,” a long haul for any war -- whether real or fictionalized on television.

4 comments about "On 'Homeland,' The War On Terror Drones On".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Chuck Lantz from 2007ac.com, 2017ac.com network, October 8, 2014 at 3:59 p.m.

    Comparing "24", or any of those other shows, to "Homeland" is like comparing Fox News to any real news network. The writing, acting, direction and storylines on "Homeland" is still brilliant and compelling, and best of all, aimed at viewers with fully functioning brains.

    Besides all that, the fact that the Carrie Mathison character has some inner demons to deal with, as she deals with the real demons in her world, is very accurate. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, not remain completely sane in her situation.

    And, as with most high-tension work environments, her bosses have obviously weighed her talent against her mental issues and have decided for the most part that the risk is worth it.

  2. Chuck Lantz from 2007ac.com, 2017ac.com network, October 8, 2014 at 4:03 p.m.

    I sure wish you had an edit function, so dopes like myself could correct the errors I'm always missing when I hit "submit comment." I meant to write "It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to remain completely sane in her situation." ...

    And it would also be nice if paragraphs were allowed.

  3. Brian Kelly from brian brands, October 8, 2014 at 4:17 p.m.

    I agree with you Adam.
    While Carrie has the fortitude to sign up for yet another tour of wide-eyed duty, I felt like zest for the zero dark thirty flight to bad guy land has waned.
    Showtime and Fox must be expecting lots of green patriotic recruits.
    When will "Jimmy Fallon" variety show appear on prime time?

  4. Chuck Lantz from 2007ac.com, 2017ac.com network, October 8, 2014 at 5:40 p.m.

    I've got to jump back in here for a minute in defense of "Homeland", though they are doing fine without my help. While I can't speak for other viewers, a large part of my fascination with the show has to do with their skilled handling of the thought processes that occur on both sides, and in between. While they do have their share of bang-bang, their focus is much more on why certain people choose certain paths. Like the bombs they deal with, discovering the rationale of the people responsible and what makes them tick is the only valid way to disarm them, to stretch a metaphor way too far.

Next story loading loading..