So let’s say, hypothetically, one wanted to break up with Facebook? Just how would one do that?
I heard one person say that swearing off Facebook was being in a “position of privilege.” That was an odd statement, until I thought about it a bit. This person was right. Much as I’d like to follow in retired tech journalist Walter Mossberg’s footsteps and quit Facebook cold turkey, I don’t think I can. I am not in that position. I am not so privileged.
This is no way condones Facebook and its actions. I’m still pretty pissed off about that. I suspect I might well be in an abusive relationship. I have this suspicion because I looked it up on Mentalhealth.net, a website offered by the American Addictions Centers. According to them, an abusive relationship is “where one thing mistreats or misuses another thing. The important words in this definition are 'mistreat' and 'misuse'; they imply that there is a standard that describes how things should be treated and used, and that an abuser has violated that standard.
For the most part, only human beings are capable of being abusive, because only human beings are capable of understanding how things should be treated in the first place and then violating that standard anyway.”
That sounds bang-on when I think about how Facebook has treated its users and their personal data. And everyone will tell you that if you’re in an unhealthy relationship, you should get out.
But it’s not that easy. And that’s because of Metcalfe’s Law. Originally applied to telecommunication networks, it also applies to digitally mediated social networks. Metcalfe’s Law states that “the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users of the system.”
The example often used is a telephone. If you’re the only person with one, it’s useless. If everyone has one, it’s invaluable. Facebook has about 2.3 billion users worldwide. That’s one out of every three people on this planet. Do the math. That’s a ton of value. It makes Facebook what they call very “sticky” in Silicon Valley.
But it’s not just the number of users that makes Facebook valuable. It’s also the way they use it. Facebook always intended to become the de facto platform for broad-based social connection. As such, it is built of “weak ties” -- those social bonds that connect scattered nodes in a network, as defined by Mark Granovetter almost 50 years ago.
To go back to the aforementioned “position of privilege” comment, the privilege in this case is a lack of dependence on weak ties.
My kids could probably quite Facebook. At least, it would be easier for them than it would be for me. But they also are not in the stage of their life where weak ties are all that important. They use other platforms, like Snapchat, to communicate with their friends. That's a channel built for strong ties.
If they do need to bridge weak ties, they escalate their social postings, first to Instagram, then, finally, to their last resort: Facebook. It’s only through Facebook where they’ll reach parents, aunts, cousins and grandmas all at once.
It’s different for me. I have a lifetime of accumulated weak ties that I need to connect with all the time. And Facebook is the best way to do it. I connect with various groups, relatives, acquaintances and colleagues on an as-needed basis. I also need a Facebook presence for my business, because it’s expected by others who need to connect to me. I don’t have the privilege of severing those ties.
So, I’ve decided that I can’t quit Facebook. At least, not yet.
But I can use Facebook differently -- more impersonally. I can use it as a connection platform rather than a channel for personal expression. I can make sure as little of my personal data falls into Facebook’s hands as possible.
I don’t need to post what I like, how I’m feeling, what my beliefs are or what I do daily. I can close myself off to Facebook, turning this into a passionless relationship. From now on, I’ll consider it a tool -- not a friend nor confidante, not something I can trust -- just a way to connect when I need to. My personal life is none of Facebook’s business -- literally.For me, this will be the first step in preventing more abuse.