Commentary

Note To Our National News Media: Thanks For Nothing

While America burns, and fear and unrest grip the nation, what does our TV news media do?

It throws fuel on a fire that does not need any, for the sake of ratings and money.

They do not report. They do not search for and then deliver facts. They are not interested in reality.

Their purpose is to stir up the factions that follow them. Their aim is to do all they can to ensure that the images of chaos and tumult that they are using now to attract and retain viewership remain plentiful for as long as possible.

In times of turmoil, Americans turn to TV news in greater numbers. Ratings are up, and the natural instinct of TV news is to try and keep them there. 

advertisement

advertisement

For them, the sound and fury of the past week’s demonstrations are like discovering a gold mine. People who discover gold do not give it up if they can help it. On the contrary, they seek to have it continue to produce gold on their behalf.

Instead of casting a much wider net to perhaps report on how other groups of Americans -- the millions not participating in the protest marches, for example -- feel about the state of our world, the TV newspeople and their cameras gravitate naturally to the scenes of chaos.

Then, rather than give it to us straight, these newspeople take sides. Armies establish battle lines in opposition to each other, not journalists -- or at least that is how it used to work.

Since when did it become OK for news organizations to editorialize throughout their broadcasts, in the case of TV, or in their news pages, as in newspapers and on news web pages?

So now, TV news not only emphasizes our problems and our divisions, it chooses to add to them by presenting hours and hours of heated conversations about them. At times like these, these conversations are never-ending, and it should go without saying that they solve nothing.

Chaos, as seen in the protest images, and noise, as reflected in those same images and in the TV news discussions, make for sights and sounds that are more arresting than images that contain neither.

Scenes in which Americans are going about their lives in settings that are not tumultuous are not nearly as useful to our visual media. 

Call this TV Blog a rant if you must, but it results from a search for facts, calm, courage and hope in our TV news that has proven to be fruitless.

The three news channels represented by the three photos above -- MSNBC (Rachel Maddow), CNN (Anderson Cooper) and Fox News Channel (Laura Ingraham) -- are far from the only culprits here, but they are certainly in the forefront in their constant efforts to fan flames rather than extinguish them.

And who are they to tell anyone else how they should feel on issues of importance to us all? They are people not too different from the rest of us, only they have these national platforms.

The settings from which they deliver their screeds and commentaries -- the fake “desks” they sit behind in their well-lit studios -- tend to give them an aura of authority.

But when it comes to their knowledge, judgments or instincts, they are just people with opinions, just like the rest of us. 

Speaking for myself, I do not wish to get my news from people who are just like the rest of us. I would prefer people who understand that news is not commentary, and journalists are not supposed to position themselves as partisan soldiers in an opinion war.

Oh, well. That ship, like so many others before it, has sailed.

5 comments about "Note To Our National News Media: Thanks For Nothing".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Tim Brooks from consultant, June 10, 2020 at 11:04 a.m.

    Adam, this might be a rant but it is spot on, and needed to be said. For many years (long before the current POTUS) the "mainstream" news media have been gravitating toward emphasizing conflict - violence, sex wherever possible - creating and encouraging those very things. Dr. George Gerbner of the Annenberg School wrote long ago about the "mean world syndrome" and what it does to viewers. But the news media, in its self-righteousness, does not seem to care what it does to society. Its credibility has steadily declined as a result. This is not to say "reporters" don't believe in the causes they champion under the guise of "news reporting." Or that there aren't some responsible adults still in the room - try Wolf Blitzer on CNN or Bret Baier on Fox, earlier in the evening. My advice is to choose your shows carefully, staying out of prime time; or reduce your news viewing altogether. You'll feel less stressed.

  2. Mark Laurence from Greater Media, June 10, 2020 at 12:07 p.m.

    That's kind of a funny viewpoint, coming from a critic. None of these broadcasters represents their program as just-the-facts journalism. There's a place for opinions, including yours, in broadcasting just as there is in newspapers and websites. Cable news-based networks attract maybe 10 million viewers on a big night. If you don't like it, join the 320 million Americans who don't watch. 

  3. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, June 10, 2020 at 12:08 p.m.

    I agree with Tim but  it's important to note that what is termed "news"--- the blathering and trivial or false crap that we see so often on social media or the "commentaries" on the primetime programs featured by CNN, Fox and MSNBC, while called "news" aren't really what an objective observer would consider "new's" in the traditional sense. I think that there are still a lot of TV news people at the national and local level who consider themselves  "journalists" who want no part of the other kind of "news" that strirs everyone to hate "the enemy". I like to watch Wolf Blitzer as he does epitomize what is really news reporting---asking reasonable and fair questions whenever possible. And I often see the same thing away from primetime ---even on the cable news channels, but especially, on local news. Which is probably one of the reasons---the other being their local orienattion---why local news shows up so positively in surveys about trust.

  4. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, June 10, 2020 at 12:12 p.m.

    Mark, the average minute Nielsens don't really define the reach of the cable news channels primetime lineups. On a given evening, they probably reach something like 20- 25 million people and, over longer periods of time their reach is much greater. My point being, that these "opinion" or "commentary" shows are not playing to a tiny audience.

  5. David Scardino from TV & Film Content Development, June 10, 2020 at 12:30 p.m.

    "If it bleeds, it leads..." Never were truer words spoken; to forget them is to put oneself in peril.

Next story loading loading..