Twitter is a useful tool, but is it a necessity? What would the world look like without it?
I remember when Twitter first emerged. A friend who was an early adopter first
told me about it. He saw the role it would take far earlier than anyone else I knew. I admittedly didn’t understand Twitter then, although I came to value its place in the media landscape
later.
I created my profile and started to use the platform semi-regularly, but Twitter never became the centerpiece of my digital lifestyle. I found it a quick way to get some information,
but I could generally get that same information from other sources. To me, Twitter never achieved the value of Google or other services available online.
Twitter has been the centerpiece
of celebrity access to fans, circumventing traditional news and entertainment sources. It’s the logical successor for the open-publishing aspect of the web, but its only real value is that it
amasses an audience and generated reach.
advertisement
advertisement
But reach is not the sole domain of Twitter. Many other platforms have been able to aggregate reach, and others will rise over the next few
years. And reach is ultimately not a competitive advantage, since it can be replaced quickly. Just ask Infoseek and Alta Vista, or MySpace and Friendster.
The core of the question is,
does a platform like Twitter have value in the ecosystem of news and entertainment when it becomes the focal point of the news, with its own entertainment value?
Elon Musk has made
Twitter’s business the story, and in doing so is taking away from the usefulness of the platform itself. He is also doing so in a very public way, which was not necessary. He could
have made the desired changes behind closed doors and simply looked to see how they worked, or didn’t. Instead, he has turned Twitter into a farce, and the audience, the advertisers and
the people involved with the business are not happy.
Social media is here to stay, for better and oftentimes for worse. The internet is a self-publishing vehicle and anyone with a
computer and a brain can create content. If Twitter were to turn off tomorrow, something else would inevitably emerge to take its place.
What Musk has failed to understand is that
digital media is not permanent. The habits of your users will change, and they will move on to newer platforms that exhibit a new value.
Musk speaks of Twitter as a necessary platform to
further free speech, but many of his very decisions are counter to that ideal.
Twitter has made it easier to shine a light on the thoughts of many and created a discourse that the world needed
to have, but it’s not a requirement for the ongoing evolution of the human race. I think we will do just fine without it.
So I ask again: Does the world really need
Twitter?