Commentary

Purging Programmatic: Publisher Tries To Live Without It

All you have to do to make money these days is put an older man in a white jacket and stethoscope, and have him say “Hi, I’m a board-certified oncologist. But my practice had a lot of churn, and I wanted to know why. Then I discovered something…” 

It's not as ridiculous as it sounds. Ads promising miracle cures for diseases, gadgets that can prevent your house from collapsing and remedies for everything from hair loss to failing libido regularly pop up online. They resemble the disreputable mail-order ads that once filled the backs of magazines. 

And they get there from one source: programmatic advertising. 

That’s the thesis of an article in the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR). It reports that American Prospect has “done away with programmatic advertising” on its site because of the incongruity between these types of ads and its own values.  

advertisement

advertisement

Programmatic ads are “a type of advertisement built on surveillance that follows a reader from place to place,” CJR observers.

 “The reader’s attention, behavior, and personal data become a commodity, packaged and resold through a supply chain riddled with fraud, opaque middlemen, and unscrupulous actors,” writes Mitch Grummon, publisher of American Prospect, CJR adds. “And we, as a publisher, must admit to being an accomplice in that transaction.” 

Grummon points to a click-bait ad that ran in American Prospect: “Take this test to determine if you are gay, straight or bisexual.” (The first question: “Do you think you are gay?”)

This was “scammy stuff that is antithetical to the brand because of clumsy keyword targeting,” Grummon comments.   

Dumping programmatic is a courageous thing to do at a time when publishers are in desperate need of revenue. And here’s the real question: does programmatic really pay out? 

A 2019 study found that the return “isn’t that great,” CJR continues. “When a user’s cookie is available publisher’s revenue increases by only about 4%,” the study determined.

What happened when American Prospect dumped programmatic?

“So far, the change seems to be working out: in the month since moving away from programmatic ads, the amount of time people spend on the Prospect site has nearly doubled,” CJR says.

We don’t recommend killing programmatic unless you are absolutely sure you can live without it.  

Meanwhile, the American Prospect team has to review direct-sold ads that come in for their content. The “Am I Gay?” folks will have to advertise elsewhere. 

 

 

1 comment about "Purging Programmatic: Publisher Tries To Live Without It".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Craig Mcdaniel from Sweepstakes Today LLC, May 29, 2026 at 10 p.m.

    Ray, nice article.  I have posted on MP many time about placing sweepstakes and contests on Sweepstakestoday.com. In 23 years, I would prefer to earn revenue from this form over programatic. I have several major brands who I work with directly on their sweeps and expect more in the near future. The bigger problem is some of the agencies don't want direct buying desk anymore and would prefer to spend $5,000 to $10,000 on a PR agency. They can work with me for a small faction of the price. I receive somewhere up to ten PR agencies per week asking for me to place their offers. When I ask for money, they say we don't have the budget. What a joke. I am sure thei clients would choke on that joke if they heard from me directly.

    The point is, my search engine for sweeps is far superior to Google and the AI programs because we micro target on one category. I plan on building mutilple micro search engines based on all new programming so the Columbia Journalism Review and others can build their hand places ads.

Next story loading loading..