Google's chief privacy officer Peter Fleischer, chief legal counsel David Drummond, former CFO George Reyes and a fourth executive are being prosecuted in Milan because the company hosted a three-minute video showing teens bullying a 17-year-old boy with Down syndrome. Needless to say, the Google executives hauled into court didn't upload the clip themselves, or even know of it, until the company received complaints. Nonetheless, they now face up to three years in jail.
The U.S. views freedom of speech as so important that it protects Web publishers from liability for material uploaded by users. While users themselves are still responsible for their crimes, sites like YouTube don't face liability for hosting the videos. Without the U.S. Communications Decency Act, which generally protects Web hosts from liability, a broad array of Internet companies would have long ago been sued out of existence.
EU law also provides that Internet service providers aren't liable for material uploaded by users. But that law appears to conflict with a separate Italian statute that allows courts to find Web publishers guilty of criminal defamation and privacy violations based on user-generated clips.
The International Association of Privacy Professionals reported Monday afternoon that the Italian authorities have accused Google executives of criminal defamation and privacy violations based on hosting the video. In the U.S., even without the Communications Decency Act, Google executives wouldn't face prosecution for comparable charges because media companies can generally publish anything they want as long as it's true.
A court in Milan, originally slated to hold proceedings today, adjourned the case until Feb. 18. None of the four executives appeared today, and it's not clear that they will appear in the future -- despite Google's statement that the company intends to defend the case. Certainly someone like Reyes, who is based in the U.S. and no longer works at Google, has little incentive to voluntarily appear in court in Italy. It seems extremely unlikely that a U.S. court would order his extradition to face prosecution for something that wouldn't be a crime in this country.
I am concerned by this news. More so because of the ISP issues. I can see implications.
This is a chilling development. What I wonder is, what constitutes a "global presence" -- legally speaking? Does it mean that anyone in the world can -- if they wish and if their country doesn't have free speech firewalls -- access your Web site? Or does it mean you have established, for example, a Google Italia and/or a brick and mortar presence in Italy? If the latter, one wonders whether Google did proper legal due diligence before going to Italy. If the former, I don't see how the Italians can make it stick without such a hue and cry from the international community that it just wouldn't be worth it.
Can anyone say Fairness Doctrine?
We are slowly going to see the same thing start to happen here, and when they can't stop the idiots from posting content, or talk, they will stop the delivery system.
Time to think about the laws we are allowing to come into being just because that cause or person is someone we don't like. Eventually every will find they have stepped on someones toes.
These kids that exploited and abused the Down's child are monsters for sure, but since Google takes it upon them selves to remove content, I think they also take the accountability of it. If they ignored all uploads, then they could maybe have a leg to stand on.
The big issue now is that Google is liable under Italian law. Not much wiggle room as I see it. Time to block serving Italy with content?