Between the realization of an eye-opening, game-changing insight gleaned from advertising test results and Web behavior data, the report you were gleefully ferrying to the C-Suite wilted, turned brown at the edges and started to dribble a slimy substance with a conspicuous stench.
The CMO immediately developed a nose-squint. The VP of corporate communications had that "Ooooh, you're in for it!" look in her eye and the VP of advertising nudged the director of direct marketing and said sotto-voce: "The golden boy is about to find out his day in the sun has turned him to toast."
The CMO pointed to (but did not touch)
a traffic report from comScore
a traffic report from Hitwise
a chart from Compete.com
an ad banner report from Atlas
a traffic report from Omniture and
another from Google Analytics
"It's like the old joke," she says with no humor at all. "If you take all the economists in the world and line them up end-to-end, they all point different directions. What the hell is going on with these numbers? Are we getting thirty-two and a half million people on our Web site or forty-four million?"
The first time you ran into this nest of nettles, you hopped over to the white board and cheerfully explained all about:
multiple machine browsing
multiple browser browsing
multiple people on the same cookie
dynamic IP addressing
called pixel placement
You didn't even get to the good stuff about comparing miles to gallons and how
different tools using
different date cut-off routines and
different methods to capture
different types of data to store in
different kinds of databases with a
different method of data cleansing and
different slicing and dicing segmentation to produce
different kinds of reports that ended up in
different feed for integration into
different data warehouses
... before you were thanked for your help and shown the door -- permanently.
You don't fall for it this time.
This time you explain that the world of online marketing has been suffering from a delusion of precision and an expectation of exactitude.
You tell them that we live in a world of statistics and probabilities. We can't count all the stars in the sky so we don't try. We don't try to get an actual count of:
bus poster readers
floor sticker readers
airline ticket jacket readers
sandwich board readers
Instead, we count some and estimate the rest.
You share the good news that we can do this better than any of the above -- and we've got some astonishing tools and techniques for dynamically targeting the audience and optimizing each one's experience.
You say, "we get 36.3 million people coming to our Web site."
She lowers her half-glasses and gives you the look you last saw when caught using the office copy machine for party invitations. So you add: "With a 4% margin of error and it's a benchmark we can compare month-over-month from now on."
"So somewhere between 34 and a half and 38 million."
"Pretty much right between them, in fact."
Disparagingly, she asks: "You really can't give me a more accurate number of how many people saw this digital marketing masterpiece that costs me tens of millions a year?"
"I can tell you whether our digital visitors are more engaged with our brand, come back more often, buy from us and discuss our products with their friends. How many people buy our products who saw our ads on CNN and "Oprah" that cost you hundreds of millions a year?"
The VP of advertising makes himself visibly smaller.
"I came here to show you a way that could save four million dollars of search marketing while boosting online sales by six to eight percent."
The scowl leaves the CMO's face. The odor of dubious data dissipates, the conversation suddenly immaterial. Her eyes narrow as she leans forward and says: "Show me."
The numbers don't have to be precise -- just compelling.