A couple of weeks ago,
New York Post columnist Andrea Peyser wrote about a limited-edition American Girl doll named Gwen, who is homeless. The back-story is that dad walked out, leaving mom
and daughter to fend for themselves. Bloggers evidently have been kicking around the irony of a $95 toy representing homelessness for a few months now, as Amy Graff points out in SFGate's
"The Mommy Files" blog, but Peyser kicked the controversy up a notch. Whatever the vibe Barbie sent about body
image, she didn't "politically indoctrinate" the young Peyser with messages such as "men are bad" and "women are hopeless," she wrote.
In a
Brandchannelpost this morning, Jennifer Wright picks up the controversy,
writing that "the most disturbing part of all of it is the fact that the doll costs $95, no portion of which goes towards the homeless." She does point out that Mattel is donating proceeds
from the sale to an anti-bullying campaign.
Detroit Free Press features editor Kristen Jordan Shamus broke that
story yesterday, writing that her own misgivings about purchasing the doll
for her daughter were assuaged by a chat with Mattel spokeswoman Julie Parks. Because Gwen was introduced as a figure in a bullying story, the company connected with the Ophelia Project, a nonprofit
dedicated to helping young people handle bullying. And over the past 19 years, American Girl also has donated about $9 million worth of clothing and books to Kids in Distressed Situations, which
provides help to children who are homeless otherwise in need.
Seems like that's one back-story Mattel needs to do a better job with
advertisement
advertisement
.
Read the whole story at New York Post, SFGate, Brandchannel, Detroit Free Press »