Magazines have a problem, but it's not what you might think. Magazines are suffering from an inferiority complex -- but even more so, from a lack of creativity.
I love magazines. I
always have, and no element of technology is going to make me change my opinion. I subscribe to and/or purchase about 30 publications, either weekly or monthly. I love the tactile feel of
magazines and I love the passive, lean-back, relaxing way they provide me with information without the requirement of a battery or an Internet connection. I love the smell of a newsstand.
I love the feel of paper between my fingers. Technology owns me just about everywhere else; all my music is now digital, all my TV is digital. With the iPad I'm certain my book consumption
will be going digital. I even recently canceled my subscription to the Sunday New York Times in recognition that I'd be shifting all my newspaper consumption to digital, but magazines
will never go away for me.
advertisement
advertisement
So why magazine folks have to run ads, in magazines, to try and get me to keep reading magazines?
No -- I'm not making this up. I opened up my latest
issue of Entertainment Weekly to find a two-page spread that wreaked of desperation (and poor targeting) by pleading with me from some falsified emotional stance to continue reading
magazines. Isn't that like preaching to the converted, at least a little bit? If you feel the need to place a desperate plea for my attention, at least run the spot on the Web, where your
converted masses are headed.
Of course, the inferiority complex of magazines compared to digital media is not the point, it's a symptom of the problem. Magazines lack a sense of
creativity. Times have indeed changed, but magazines aren't changing with it. Why aren't all magazines printed on recycled paper? Why don't magazines offer extended content
online to supplement their print counterparts? Why don't magazines test some form of paid access model, which is where they're headed with the iPad anyway?
Why don't magazines find
some way to get rid of the BRC (that silly card that always, yes always, falls out of the magazine and certainly creates more hassle and annoyance than it does subscription conversions)?
Why doesn't the magazine business become more innovative? At the very least, why doesn't the magazine business stop worrying about the future and embrace it a bit, and try to find a way to
thrive in a world where not everything will be connected to the Web (Yes, I said it, not everything will be connected to the Web)?
Why doesn't the magazine business find a new way of
distributing in product in locations where digital access is an issue? Why don't they start selling magazines like they sell popcorn in the baseball parks -- with strolling vendors?
Why not reach people in the places where they're most likely to read magazines - on the train, on the plane, on the bus?
And if you're going to run ads to get me to stay, why not put your
money where your true audience might be -- not in your own very own magazines, where the people who've already left are least likely to see you?
Take a cue from the music business: Don't fight
technology. Embrace it, but don't abandon your core, which is not going to die, even though it may decrease a bit. Don't fight the future, find a way to work with it. Create your
iPad apps and your Kindle apps -- but encourage me to want to use your printed, environmentally friendly versions where I know they'll be most appropriate.
And remind me what it's like
to lie in bed, curled up under the covers, with a magazine falling on my chest, as I drift slowly to sleep after a long and arduous day, reading about great people and great ideas. That's how
you keep my attention.
Good luck, mags! I'll be rooting for you!