Commentary

Considering Their Viewership, Cable Networks Get Too Much -- But Also Too Little

Does it matter that two broadcast and cable financial measures are still out of kilter? 

For years, we have listened to cable networks complain about not getting their fair share of advertising dollars -- that is, compared to what broadcasters grab. A 60% audience share by a cable network should yield 60% of the media dollars --- in theory. 

Let's assume those aggressive cable network advertising sales executives are right -- for the moment. 

But what about the other side of the coin: distribution/cable subscriber fees? For a long time, cable networks have grabbed perhaps too high revenues in this area -- at least compared to the broadcast networks. 

ESPN gets $4 a month per cable subscriber -- but broadcast networks with many more viewers like CBS, ABC, Fox or NBC can barely get 50 cents a cable subscriber per month in their respective retransmission deals -- nowhere near their near-term goal of, say, $1 a subscriber. 

It's not just ESPN -- take a look at data for the entire industry. Cable networks grab 96% of all cable operator programming revenue but only deliver 60% of the ratings points, according to one Morgan Stanley media analyst.  

advertisement

advertisement

Should a correction be made here -- as well? You bet.  

This should leave us somewhere down the middle of the road. 

Rino Scanzoni, chief investment officer of big media agency Group M, believes more advertising dollars will flow to cable networks, anyway -- because ratings will grow there.   

Still, we might still hear from cable networks about how that isn't enough- -that they might still be lagging the broadcast networks in terms of key, fundamental program price per thousand viewers (CPMs), in which there remains a big 15% to 20% gap.

But with the coming of the digital age -- does any of this matter? If all TV shows are viewed through some digital mechanism at any time, the long-term cable/broadcast price disparity would seem to disappear. 

Right now, before we fully head into that era, two financial-viewership measures will stay out of whack.

2 comments about "Considering Their Viewership, Cable Networks Get Too Much -- But Also Too Little ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. William Hughes from Arnold Aerospace, August 4, 2010 at 11:59 a.m.

    I haven't paid one Red Cent for Cable or Satellite since 2006. Since the Cable Companies are paid MILLIONS of Dollars by the Pharmaceutical Companies to air their "ED Pill" Commercials, among others at times when Children are watching TV they obviously no longer needed my miniscule payment of $65.00. Hence forth I dropped my Subscription. I still pay $65.00 a Month for Entertainment, but all of it is Commercial-Free!

  2. Andrew Crowley from ggiyt, August 4, 2010 at 3:35 p.m.

    someone needs to direct these networks to itvratings.com for a more accurate ratings system

Next story loading loading..