Twitter Is For Tweeting

Will Facebook replace email? I don't know. It has as good a shot as any company has ever had at dominating how people communicate, but there are a number of challenges still ahead. Since the Internet began there has always been one question that unimaginative investors and naysayers use to tell innovative companies to not do something: "Why wouldn't ______ just do it?" Or, depending on the decade, "Where is Microsoft, Google or Facebook?"


It's funny, having started a company that was founded and built during Google's height of dominance, MySpace's 15 minutes of fame and Facebook's rise, I have actually heard "Why wouldn't Google just do it?", "Why wouldn't MySpace just do it?" AND "Why wouldn't Facebook just do it?" at various points. You better believe Twitter, Foursquare and every other innovative service on the Web has dealt with the same questions. But a funny thing happened on the way to Facebook replacing Twitter: People continued using Twitter, and in increasing numbers.



The difficulty in being all things to all people is one part perception and one part product. People tend to form perceptions of products and services that dominate their behavior. The internet has infinite choices with regard to almost any service. In order to not be paralyzed by choice, people simply allow particular services to define an action they will perform. Hence Twitter is for sharing bits of content, personal or professional, Foursquare is for location-based events, etc. It's just easier to build behavior patterns. It's why the best service from a usability perspective or feature perspective is not always the service that wins. This is one factor that always confounds people outside looking in.

The other difficulty in being all things to all people is that product development gets very, very complicated. It is hard enough to design a product that will achieve mass adoption; now design a product that will achieve mass adoption but must incorporate additional functionality to service the bigger product's main function. It's just easier to evolve and iterate on a product for consumers when there is a focus on excellence for one function.

Of course, examples like Google Maps prove that expanding works when the new service truly leverages the core competence (search) and its development and innovation can be very compartmentalized. When it comes to Facebook replacing email, there is the potential for similar synergies and challenges. I am looking forward to testing the innovation.

What do you think? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and let's connect on Twitter:

4 comments about "Twitter Is For Tweeting".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Mike Patterson from WIP, Inc., November 16, 2010 at 8:57 p.m.

    Nice work Joe, totally agree, people often associate a site or an app with one action and primarily use it for that. Go deep and not wide! Investors generally don't get that!

  2. Stephen Shearin from ionBurst Media, November 17, 2010 at 10:09 a.m.

    Investors to Henry Ford: "Why wouldn't Southern Pacific just do it?"

    When the tech overlays (your excellent search/map example) it makes sense. Firing up a full service email app is no walk in the park.

    In short, don't go to a steak house for fish nor a fish house for steak. And don't be intimidated by the status quo. There is ALWAYS room at the top.

  3. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited, November 18, 2010 at 11:45 a.m.

    Then why would MediaPost eliminate Recommend reading this article? If I would subject my friends, they could never understand why they would be involved with MediaPost. I have forwarded a few of the articles which may be pertinent to their specific business/interest, but overall, just because your article is meaningful and would recommend it to be read by this specific audience, it doesn't mean I should shove it on others because I like it. As for twits, short for twitterers or birdie-ers .....

  4. Fj Rich from chase media group, November 18, 2010 at 11:45 a.m.

    Very insightful. You're becoming quite the behaviorist. Very practical view, easier for ground level operatives to understand.


Next story loading loading..