One of the remarkable things about social media is its flexibility, which allows people to use it for pretty much any purpose you can imagine, running the gamut from personal to political to
professional and everywhere in between.
For example, IndustryWeek reports that one of the nation's largest unions is using Facebook to organize a campaign against free trade
agreements which it says threaten American jobs. The International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, with total of about 700,000 members, is drumming up opposition to planned trade
deals with South Korea, Columbia, and Panama with an ad campaign claiming that 682,900 American jobs have been lost since NAFTA took effect, and warning of something similar happening again.
While there's much to be said for social media's specific contextual advantages, part of the motivation seems to simply be saving money, as IAM communications director Rick Sloan noted
that social media "reaches a much wider audience at far lower costs than main street media." Of course it's still not clear whether this reach translates into real influence,
considering that social media ROI remains a matter for debate.
I am also skeptical about social media's suitability for niche political causes. Social causes with broad emotional
appeal are one thing: the "It's Get Better" anti-bullying PSAs, for example, are made for social media. But the American public has been distinctly less supportive of organized labor,
judging by the results of a Gallup poll which show support for labor unions sliding from 59% in 2008 to 48% in 2009.
On the other hand, Americans also seem increasingly skeptical about
free trade: in a poll by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal in 2010, 47% of respondents said they thought free trade with foreign countries hurt the U.S., compared to 23% who said it helped.
Back in February I wrote about an online campaign staged by the GOP, "America Speaking Out," which invited concerned voters to submit suggestions for the GOP agenda. The
second-most-popular entry in the "jobs creation" category would "Stop the outsourcing of jobs from America to other countries that do not pay taxes into the U.S. and stop the tax
breaks that are given to these companies that are outsourcing" (although this suggestion was quietly omitted from the party's platform).