Commentary

Hungry Like The Wolf Or Crazy Like The Fox?

“Strut on a line, it's discord and rhyme
I'm on the hunt, I'm after you
Mouth is alive with juices like wine
And I'm hungry like the wolf”

Duran Duran’s “Hungry Like the Wolf” seems like an appropriate song for this week and perhaps captures some of the sentiment I’ve been hearing in the Twitter-sphere, blogosphere and across the social web about Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram. The cacophony ranges from backlash in the Instagram community about the app being gobbled up by the wolf [Facebook], Facebook overpaying for a company that has no revenue and another group wondering if Facebook is crazy … like a fox. 

No matter which part of the chorus you’re part of, what is certain is that this acquisition is a clear sign of the power of mobile audiences and photos being “atomic content” when it comes to what people like love to share. If you’re a brand, entertainment company or otherwise, you better have an “image strategy” on your digital marketing strategy short list. 

advertisement

advertisement

Back to the deal for a moment and why entertainment brands need to pay attention. 

My opinion is that the backlash will settle down as people choose to find an alternate service they feel is better than an Instagram owned by Facebook (a/k/a FaceTagram, InstaBook). For example, Via.me which lets users share pictures and videos, or Pixlr-o-matic if you just want to share photos. In fact, Via.Me makes it really easy to transfer all your photos over from Instagram. 

If you’re in the camp that thinks Facebook overpaid for a company that has no real revenue model, you may be right but only time will tell.  The reality is that the cost of capital for Facebook is incredibly cheap. 

If you think Facebook is crazy like a fox, I agree with you.  As an example of this cunning move, look no further than Google’s acquisition of YouTube.  At the time, YouTube was a little-known video site with no revenue but a huge audience.  Google made a bet that video was going to be big and that a lot of content would be delivered into homes via the Internet. Today, YouTube is the de facto standard for video search and is the largest video site on the web. The question for Facebook will be whether it is able to create a similar story for Instagram. To date, it has swallowed up the companies it has acquired vs. letting them stand alone.  

So what does all this really mean for entertainment brands?

Brands should be developing an image strategy. In fact, it’s something brands should be doing on a rapid iteration basis, to figure out how best to use images to engage with their audiences. Pictures enable brands to curate brand persona, help explain core values and build excitement about upcoming products and movie releases.

How cool would it be to subscribe to a movie star on a service and get “sneak peek” photos from the set of an upcoming summer blockbuster? And with food photography a big category, celebrity chefs and food brands are turning their photos to entertainment assets they extend from shows, etc. As was recently said at John Battelle’s Signal-SF event, photos are “atomic content” blowing up when it comes to what people love to share. 

Since somebody just sent me a photo of my favorite beer waiting for me down the street at my favorite bar, I need to go because now I’m thirsty after all this writing. I rest my case.

8 comments about "Hungry Like The Wolf Or Crazy Like The Fox? ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Stacey Massey from , April 12, 2012 at 1:09 p.m.

    $1B valuation with no revenue is crazy like a fox but if anyone can afford to be crazy it's Facebook! I think Via.Me is a viable alternative to Facegram - in fact maybe even better since it has video too - definitely worth checking out.

  2. Sara L from , April 12, 2012 at 1:21 p.m.

    The FaceTagram union further opens the door to mobile sharing apps. WIth the 12% Twittersphere approval rating, users are fleeing for the hills of other media sharing services. I've already ported my Instagram photos over to Via.Me (it was a breeze), and the best part of Via.Me is I can share video and audio too! Song snippets, group chants, concerts -- all go onto my Via.Me page for my friends to see & share with a link.

  3. Sam Canchola from San Jose State University, April 12, 2012 at 1:41 p.m.

    Brands should DEFINITELY have an Image Strategy. I've been learning about this in a few classes and it makes complete sense. I downloaded Via.Me as well as Pixlr-o-matic and found that I enjoyed the Social side of Via.Me more. I also saw brands and celebrities like Cheesecake Factory and Antonio Cromartie of the New York Jets on Via.Me. It's looking like Via.Me is the hot spot for Image Strategy!

    With that said, follow MY Image Strategy! :) http://via.me/Sam_Canch

  4. Robert Tye from ., April 12, 2012 at 2:20 p.m.

    Great suggestion. Via.Me is a great alternative to instagram and uploading my photos from Facegram was fast and easy. Great read!

  5. Robi Ganguly from Apptentive, April 12, 2012 at 2:20 p.m.

    Doug, great points here. Lots to dig into, but I think the best point you make is to compare this acquisition to the YouTube acquisition. Looking back at that deal, I think that what Google saw was that a substantial amount of searches were looking for video and that YouTube had cornered the market on providing great results for those searches.

    Similarly, Facebook knows that a large portion of its traffic is driven by consumption of photos. Lots of people just log into FB to tap through the photos of their friends and I'm sure that they could see in their data that a number of the heaviest publishers were shifting over to Instagram and taking their followers with them. Given that FB thrives on sharing activity (like Google does with search), it's a no-brainer for them to look at Instagram the same way that Google looked at YouTube.

    Importantly, however, it's not clear that there is the possibility to "corner the market" when it comes to sharing photos. Instagram/Facebook can be leaders here, but given the fact that they are built around sharing instead of a searchable destination, it seems like multiple networks with various purposes will grow up around this activity. Pinterest, Instagram, Flickr, Via.me - they all have interesting angles on image sharing.

  6. Melanie Lyeth from ..., April 12, 2012 at 4:33 p.m.

    The alternate that's already winning the race in my mind is Via.me...it's a cakewalk to transfer your existing photos over, their interface is easier to use, it has video, and you don't have to worry about your privacy policy changing every quarter.

  7. Melanie Lyeth from ..., April 12, 2012 at 4:34 p.m.

    The alternate that's already winning the race in my mind is Via.me...it's a cakewalk to transfer your existing photos over, their interface is easier to use, it has video and you don't have to worry about your privacy policy changing every quarter.

  8. Walter Sabo from SABO media, April 12, 2012 at 9:53 p.m.

    Well as long at Twitter and Facebook are never expected to make a profit, all is well.

Next story loading loading..