According to the Direct Marketing Association in the recently released 2012 Response Rate Report, direct mail response rates have dropped nearly 25% over the past nine years. Even so, mail campaigns draw a better overall response than digital channels. For instance, response rates for direct mail to an existing customer average 3.40%, compared with 0.12% for email, which is roughly a 30-fold difference. Costs are also higher, which translates to roughly equivalent costs-per-sale/lead for direct mail, email, and paid search.
Response By Selected Media | ||
Media | House List | Prospect or Total |
Direct mail (letter size) | 3.40% | 1.28% |
Oversized | 3.95 | 1.44 |
Postcard | 2.47 | 1.12 |
Catalog | 4.26 | 0.94 |
0.12 | 0.03 | |
Telephone | 12.95 | 8.21 |
Display | - | 0.04 |
Paid search | - | 0.22 |
Source: DMA Response Rate Report, July 2012 |
Yory Wurmser, DMA’s director of marketing and media insights, says “... even though direct mail is less effective in driving response than... a decade ago... still is among the best media for generating overall response... likely continued... in the marketing mix, even as... digital channels... gain budget share...”
Other important findings include:
For additional information from the DMA Response Rate Report, please visit here.
These stats are very interesting to look through.
I'm pretty sure their usefulness is mostly academic. (Every marketer knows that actual results could differ wildly, depending on the market, the list, the offer, the presentation...)
But it's nice to see all the data in one article. It's like walking through a hardware store where every size nut and bolt is on display.
Nice work, Jack!