
Although Bill O’Reilly’s many fans may have seen it differently, their guy came across like a colossal jerk in his confrontation last Friday with George Will on
“The O’Reilly Factor.”
It was an ugly encounter -- one of the ugliest in recent memory on a talk show, with O’Reilly behaving like a barroom bully. You can watch the
whole thing here.
At issue was a column Will wrote last week in which
he was pointedly critical of O’Reilly’s latest history book, a bestseller called “Killing Reagan.” The book is the latest in O’Reilly’s series of
“Killing” books, which he churns out at a rate of about one a year with the help of a co-writer named Martin Dugard. The pair’s other books include “Killing Lincoln” and
“Killing Kennedy,” in which “killings” actually occurred.
advertisement
advertisement
Not to minimize the importance of the attack, but Reagan was not killed when John Hinckley attempted to
assassinate him in 1981. However, the O’Reilly book -- subtitled “The Violent Assault That Changed A Presidency” -- seems to posit that the assassination attempt led to a gradual
deterioration in Reagan’s mental and physical health as he grew older, maybe even leading to his Alzheimer’s disease and eventually his death.
According to an Associated Press
story (cited here because I have not read “Killing Reagan”), the book’s hypothesis hinges mainly on a memo that circulated around the White House staff in 1987 that expressed some
aides’ fears that Reagan was not competent and might have to be relieved of his duties under constitutional guidelines outlined in the 25th Amendment.
In his nationally syndicated
column published last Thursday, Will said O’Reilly’s book amounts to slandering President Reagan because the memo the book cites has been widely discredited by a number of former White
House staffers who have all testified in interviews over the years to the president’s competence.
Will’s column derided the book’s “scholarship” as “pretense,” declared it to be
“nonsensical history” and ended this way: “Caution – you are about to enter a no-facts zone” -- a direct parody of O’Reilly’s nightly “no
spin-zone” claim on “The O’Reilly Factor.”
To Will’s credit, he agreed to appear on “The O’Reilly Factor” the very next evening, where he
withstood a withering verbal assault by O’Reilly lasting about seven minutes. Among other things, O’Reilly called Will a “hack” and complained that Will violated journalistic
protocols by not calling O’Reilly to discuss the book before he went ahead and published his column.
While O’Reilly went over a bunch of other items that ticked him off about
Will’s column, Will never lost his poise, although you could detect that he was probably upset at the way he was being treated. Will also works for Fox News as a contributor seen mainly on Chris
Wallace’s show, “Fox News Sunday.”
Will’s obligation to contact O’Reilly in this context is debatable, and was not necessarily warranted at all. With his emphasis
on this issue, the name-calling and other petty complaints, O’Reilly came across like a self-righteous crybaby -- a public figure who can dish it out all day long but cannot tolerate the same
when it is directed at him.
Will returned to the subject of O’Reilly’s book in his syndicated column published this week, on Tuesday. “Were the lungs the seat of wisdom, Fox News host Bill
O’Reilly would be wise, but they are not and he is not,” wrote Will in this column’s lead sentence. “So it is not astonishing that he is doubling down on his wager that the
truth cannot catch up with him. It has, however, already done so.”
The man does have a way with words, doesn’t he?