Commentary

5 Predictions For 2016: Mindshare's Jordan Bitterman Says Creatives Who Understand Data Have Major Advantage

I’ve always thought Jordan Bitterman, Mindshare's chief strategy officer, North America, is a really smart guy. Since he’s in the thick of the real-time/programmatic media universe, I touched base with him for his 2016 predictions.

1.     Viewability will only become more critical, not less. Here’s why: Most CMOs are still of the television generation, from a time when ad environments were safe, secure and guaranteed.  In order for any marketing organization -- but especially those helmed by seasoned CMOs -- to move dollars into digital channels, safe, secure and guaranteed must be part of the offering.

Viewability, as a term, will go away at some point, but the concept will soldier on.

2.     Ad blocking might be the best thing to happen to the industry. It’s taken up an outsized part of the conversation in 2015.  While it’s threatening to the way things are today, it could just be the best thing to happen to the industry.  And I don’t mean for that to sound like Pollyanna. 

Let’s think of it this way: An entire generation of consumers has been able to customize every part of their media lives -- from the news they read on Twitter, to the friends they're connected to on Facebook, to the video content they consume across channels.

Yet, when it comes to advertising, the majority of what gets served doesn’t take that dynamic into consideration.  The rise of ad blocking is happening at the same time as the shift to mobile.  Now is the time for publishers and marketers to do things differently.

3.     I believe we will see the beginnings of an industry “Bill of Rights” in 2016.  Marketers will promise to be more respectful in the ways they use data to deliver messaging. Publishers will promise to speed up content delivery (by reducing the number of tags on a page) and to respect the privacy of their users. Consumers will  eventually, perhaps in 2017, begin to understand that content comes at the small cost of being exposed to brands.  This is an opportunity perhaps equal to the challenge it looks like today.

4.     Creatives who understand how to use data to form or inform their work are at a major advantage. Our industry goes in cycles: Sometimes the publishers are ahead of the agencies, sometimes brands are ahead of publishers -- and so on. Right now, creatives are lagging. I say that with love and respect, as someone who admires the creative product and the many creatives I’ve worked with over the years.

But here’s why the lag: Media, and media companies, are a wellspring of data. And data is the new oil that makes the ad business run effectively.... And while there are many that do leverage data, there simply aren’t enough of them who demonstrate a positive tension between art and science.

Unfortunately, we won’t see that positive tension truly flourish until 2017.  Until then, real-time creative will be something on the horizon, but not quite in the grasp of the average creative department.

5.     The majority of marketers will acknowledge programmatic and its place in their current and future plans. We have just turned a corner on programmatic. While the word “programmatic" still carries a lot of baggage, over 50% of digital display and roughly 40% of digital video advertising are bought that way (both figures according to eMarketer).

Those data points represent tipping points.  From here, we’ll see genuine efforts by major industry players to bring cross-platform solutions to programmatic desktop, mobile and television.

But, more importantly, these are important plateaus because once we feel an ownership stake in something, we also feel a requirement to make it better. 

At the end of the day, programmatic is simply data-driven decisioning -- or “automated intelligence,” as I like to call it.  That’s all it is.  The transparency discussion, the disclosed vs. non-disclosed argument -- all that is a distraction from the main reason it exists in the first place: to harness data to make informed and effective decisions.

My prediction is that we will look back on 2016 as the year when the industry tossed aside many of the negative perceptions of programmatic and began to collectively make it a more successful venue in earnest.

5 comments about "5 Predictions For 2016: Mindshare's Jordan Bitterman Says Creatives Who Understand Data Have Major Advantage".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Mark Stewart from Townsquare Media, December 2, 2015 at 12:01 p.m.

    Jordan is right on the money again. Incredible insights into the dynamic, agendas and interoperability between audiences, advertisers, agencies and publishers. Agree 100% that creatives, and account planners, at creative agencies have been on the lagging edge of big data. Big data provides the "what" but big insights from the data drive the "why". And "why" drives content, context and thus audience relevance. Jordan's first 3 points inform point 4, and point 5 reminds us that an impression isn't an impression unless it makes one.          

  2. Tobi Elkin from MediaPost, December 2, 2015 at 6:27 p.m.

    The creative piece is key I agree, Mark. How does data turn into actionable insights that creatives can use to work their magic?

  3. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, December 3, 2015 at 6:19 a.m.

    Using "data" has always been useful to sensible "creatives" who were guided by research not merely gut instincts. This is hardly new. For years agency "creatives" have had access to data describing the kinds of people who are product users---and heavy users--who buys each brand, their demos, mindsets, media habits, etc.etc. as well as data on their attitudes towards the product and the brands, where they shop, when they buy and use the products, etc, etc. So I'd be interested in learning exactly what new kinds of "data" are we talking about that will be of such revolutionary importance? We keep hearing about "data" as if this vauge term tells us something. And the implication is that this is all new stuff. So what's new? What about a few examples that are a bit more specific than just "datra"?

  4. David Mountain from Marketing and Advertising Direction, December 3, 2015 at 11:20 a.m.

    If you equate data with statistics, and have accurate reporting, I concur. Data without context is just noise.

  5. Mark Stewart from Townsquare Media replied, December 4, 2015 at 3:49 p.m.

    Tobi - replying to your Q there is a treasure trove of consumer behavior and learning that can inform message content as much as it can inform message delivery within "big data"  Tracking and identifying what else brand users are interested in can help a brand stand for somethng much bigger in consumers lives. A very simplistic example  a few years ago a brand team I was working with learned that time-pressed Working Mom's where big late night users of online games (crosswords, sudoku, etc.) that was the "what"  So serve some ads there. Further digging uncovered the actual "why" for hectic working Moms was not to simply "relax" but a real need to feel they at least accomplished something each day before going to bed. A much richer area for creatives to work in.                

Next story loading loading..