Commentary
Millennials Are NOT The Enemy
- by Cory Treffiletti , Featured Contributor, March 30, 2016
I’m getting really tired of reading how
Millennials are the enemy. It’s not said in so many words, but I see story after story and panel after panel about how Millennials are different than their forebears. How this is a generation that lacks loyalty to brands. They multitask an average of four more activities while watching TV than older audiences. They’re blocking ads. They don’t use Facebook.
Blah, blah, blah. If you add up the sum total of everything written about Millennials, you come to a possible conclusion that there's a war on media being waged by the Millennial generation -- which is simply not true. The fact is, we’re blaming Millennials for our own faults. The truth is, we sort of suck at what we do right now.
As the old adage goes, “A good carpenter never blames his tools.” I know the analogy doesn’t exactly apply, but let’s go with it for a moment. It’s not that there’s an audience who hates us. It’s that we’re not offering them enough value to resonate and be deemed important.
advertisement
advertisement
This is an audience that is very self-centric, but not in a bad way. This is an audience that wants a lot of information to be given to them. They are hungry. Conversely, we’re still learning how to personalize our messaging.
Think of it as like teleportation: In “Star Trek,” you could “beam” from one place to another. This meant deconstructing your body on one side, transporting it through space-time to another location, and reconstructing it. The world of modern marketing is much like that, where you have to disassemble your brand and the value you offer, “beam it” across many devices, and empower your audience to reassemble the pieces on their end, in their own time, to determine if the message resonates with them. And just like the transporter beam in Star Trek, we’re not quite there yet.
Millennials are not engaged because we’re not engaging them. They’re multitasking while watching TV because the TV we present to them is not engaging enough to garner their full attention. They’re blocking the ads because the ads are not engaging nor personalized enough.
Millennials are but one generation of consumer, and they are different than those before them. So were the Baby Boomers. So was Generation X. So will be the generation that follows the Millennials.
We need fewer stories, panels and presentations about Millennials and more about how to personalize messages and create emotional resonance. I love data, but we are over-indexing on data and foregoing emotional resonance. Personalization is a topic du jour, but it’s personalization of offers rather than personalizing emotional resonance. I love data, but data only goes so far.
A year or so ago I heard someone say he was trying to hire analysts with a commercial mindset, and that resonated with me as a marketer. Now I am suggesting we hire data scientists with a creative flair, who can take an insight and create emotional resonance. I want media planners who are able to read data, build audiences and suggest insights that tap into emotional connection. I want creative people who are not afraid of, or simply defiant of, data, but instead see it as a path to the insights that will help them create emotional connections with consumers.
The next time you see a panel about Millennials, realize that panel is focused on a Band-Aid and not a cure. The solution is to understand any audience and create a connection, rather than try to pretend you know one segment of the audience -- and that your entire future hangs on that one group.
As usual Cory a nice take (turn) on current marketing efforts to seriously consider.
Well stated Cory! Each generation has its own unique influences and emotional hot buttons. Within each generation are an array of lifestyles and perspectives. For a campaign to be truly effective, regardless of generation or segment, emotional connectedness is critical. "Big database" is meaningless unless it is used to identify opportunities and ways to connect emotionally. Indeed, data should be embraced accross disciplines to identify innovative ways to drive connectedness.
Of course, we realize that it's a mistake to think of all 18-34s as the same kind of person. But that said, "millennials" are always the leaders in exploring new---to them---things. They were always lighter than average TV viewers. They were the first to try VCRs, DVRs, The Internet, SVOD, etc. and, probably radio back in the 1920s. It's not that the available TV shows ----by and large---don't appeal to them. If all TV content suddenly turned edgy and youth-oriented, the 18-34s would probably still be lighter viewers and most people over the age of 40 would now join them in that regard. The main point is that millennials are people in transition from young singles to young marrieds to parents and careerwise, from carefree students to first-time job seekers, then to job -switchers and, finally, to career building. There's a lot of instability in this evolutionary period, which means that young adults---well, many of them----are forward looking and more inquisitive while older, more experienced and worldwise adults tend to be more set in their ways and accepting of what products are available to them----including manyTV shows they would have shunned or ignored in their youth.