There was a time, not long ago, when the major sources of pre-season buzz for a new TV series were syndicated news magazine shows, entertainment magazines, and TV sections of newspapers. While
these factors are still significant, Comic Cons and online social media have become at least as important in generating both positive and negative buzz.
For several years now, I’ve
been issuing in-depth reports on the impact of pre-season buzz in determining new series success — or rather, the lack of impact. Over the past 15 years, the success rate of new prime-time
series that received the most buzz leading up to their debuts was roughly 30% — virtually identical to the success rate for all prime-time series.
Going into the current
prime-time season, the fall broadcast series with the most pre-season buzz were ABC’s “Designated Survivor” and “Conviction,” FOX’s “The Exorcist” and
“Pitch,” and NBC’s “This is Us” and “The Good Place.” Two of the six (33%), “Designated Survivor” and “This is Us,” are
bona fide hits. The other clear new-series successes, CBS’s “Bull” and “Kevin Can Wait,” and FOX’s “Lethal Weapon,” received far less pre-season
notice.
advertisement
advertisement
There are several reasons why pre-season buzz has little impact on whether or not a new series becomes successful:
Despite the fact that their audiences skew older,
newspapers and syndicated entertainment news magazine shows tend to focus more on the younger, sexier series, rather than on shows their own viewers or readers are actually most likely to watch.
Except for CW, the average median age of the typical broadcast series viewer is over 50. This is not necessarily the same audience buzzing the most about new series online. We have
seldom seen new CBS shows get as much pre-season buzz as other networks, but it has arguably had the most new series success over the past 15 years.
Internet and Comic Con buzz is often
heavily skewed toward sci-fi and superhero series, or shows with former sci-fi stars attached. Except for CW, most broadcast series in this category tend not to live up to the hype. Cable
networks (and now Netflix) have had more success in this area.
Most social-media-based pre-season buzz comes from people who have not seen the pilot and don’t know if the show is
actually any good.
People who discuss new shows online are not necessarily going to watch them on television, particularly if the series is scheduled opposite one of their favorites.
This remains true even in today’s DVR, streaming video, time-shifted world — though how much longer this continues to be the case remains to be seen.
The impact of social media
outlets like Facebook and Twitter is less clear at this point. There does seem to be some correlation with big-event programming: major sports or political events, award shows, season finales,
etc.
But social media is currently more predictive of shows that are already on, rather than new series. Chatter about shows people have already been watching, or have recently
discovered, might provide an indication of whether a show is poised to grow or decline. NBC’s “This is Us” is a good example of a new show that has received a tremendous amount
of positive buzz throughout the season (just as FOX’s “Empire” did during its first season).
Over the past 15 years, some of the most successful broadcast series
received little pre-season attention. These include, “NCIS,” “Grey’s Anatomy,” “Criminal Minds,” “The Big Bang Theory,” “The
Mentalist,” “Castle,” “Modern Family,” “The Good Wife,” “Blue Bloods,” “Scandal,” “Chicago Fire,” and
“Empire,” to name just a few.
Who remembers “Push Nevada,” “Jack & Bobby,” “Studio 60,” “Dollhouse,”
“Flashforward,” “Terra Nova,” “The Muppets,” or “Heroes Reborn”? They were among the most heavily buzzed shows leading into their respective
seasons. None made it to season two.
There’s an old saying in our business that the fastest way to kill a bad product is through great advertising. Pre-season buzz is also
the fastest way to kill a bad TV show.