The latest edition of the Association of National Advertisers’ “Trends In Agency Compensation” report shows a rebound for the media commissions model, jumping to 12%
this year from a low of 3% of respondents in 2010.
I predict by the time the ANA conducts its next study, it will be orders of magnitude higher.
Why? Because in the near
future, a big independent agency, which spends big dollars in digital, will propose that one of its clients go back to the future… and pay a 12% commission on consumer-facing digital media
buys.
In return, the agency will pay all intermediary costs except:
Sound familiar?
advertisement
advertisement
In the days when agencies were paid by commission on media, they picked up all costs — except ad creation and ad distribution.They even paid for
measurement, such as Nielsen ratings.
Why didn't this happen with the Internet?
Two reasons:
Flash forward to 2017.
There now are many digital budgets big enough to support
commission-based payment and require agencies to pay for only those intermediaries that add value — not those that only add costs.
In this way, agencies would be charged with
cleaning up the crappy, redundant supply chain, which adds a lot more costs than it adds value.
Implementing this new "12% solution" will be a win, win, win.
Win
No. 1: Marketers would see 85% of the money they allocate to digital reach screens with ads that humans can see.
Win No. 2: Quality publishers that deliver content humans choose to
see, will see much more of the marketers digital spend hit their screens.
Win No. 3: Agencies will, over time, regain the trust of marketers. That's because the agencies are acting only on the
marketers behalf, maximizing working media, eliminating crappy supply chain intermediaries who add costs but no value.