Commentary

Maker Of $700 Smart Lock Calls It Quits

Starting a connected device business can be tough.

This is emphasized at each annual CES in Las Vegas, where countless startups show the fruits of their work, some of which will never reach the market for any number of reasons.

Now the maker of a high-end smart lock is calling it quits just before CES.

California-based Otto, which showed its smart lock in late summer, just announced it is suspending operations after a deal to be acquired fell through at the last minute.

A lengthy note from Otto founder and CEO Sam Jadallah detailed the demise of the startup.

“This past summer, we began fundraising for our next financing round,” stated Jadallah. “In early September, we were approached by a public company who understood the product we built, the engineering behind it, and the opportunity it represented. Initially they proposed investing, but quickly shifted the conversation to an acquisition. It wasn’t our desire to be acquired so early, but they helped convince us that the best path forward was to marry our innovation with their scale and distribution.”

The deal was set to close in the second week of December.

“On December 11, they called me and stated they would not complete the acquisition nor revisit the investment proposal,” said Jadallah. “I was stunned. The reason is still not understood.”

While the potential sale was in the works, the startup backed off its fundraising.

“Our signed agreement restricted our ability to solicit other bids or fundraise and targeted a close on December 11,” Jadallah said. “The interim period was consumed with meetings, trips, lawyers, planning and intensive due diligence.”

The smart lock was targeted to the high end of the market and was to be priced at $700, a steep price for any smart lock, no matter how elegant a design. The company, with some ex-Apple employees, had received tens of millions of dollars from investors.

It just may be that the acquiring company ultimately figured that getting many consumers to pay $700 for a smart lock, which can’t work as a replacement for many locks, was not a promising business.

For example, the Schlage Sense smart lock costs $200, the August Smart Lock HomeKit enabled $172, Yale Real Living Z-Wave $1600 and the Lockitron Bolt $143.

The cheapest form of hardware for opening a door isn’t very smart, but still remains the biggest competition for smart locks. It’s the key.

4 comments about "Maker Of $700 Smart Lock Calls It Quits".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Michael Margolies from Michael Margolies Photography & Design, January 2, 2018 at 5:18 p.m.

    Who was the big investor that pulled out/ We should watch and see if they bring a smart lock to market in the near future. Seems like they played dirty locking Otto out of funding while deciding to do nothing. They had to know they were going to drive them under with this tactic.

    I'm a capitalist at heart but I also beleive in fairness and open compition. This is not how good businesses or people behave.

  2. R MARK REASBECK from www.USAonly.US , January 2, 2018 at 5:20 p.m.

    Am I missing something here?   A lock protects something from unwanted guests, intruders, and secures the assets there contained.  What in the name of common sense is
    so hard about inserting a key into a lock vs clicking an app on a phone?
    Or you can unlock your door from the Bahama's on the phone.......intentional or by accident.
    Hack your phone, they get all your bank info, car and house keys, and of course all your credit card info.   
    Thanx, but no thanx.

  3. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin replied, January 2, 2018 at 9:32 p.m.

    The CEO declined to mention the name of the company, Michael. And there are plenty of new smart lock innovations being introduced at CES next week, some of which I already have heard about.

  4. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin replied, January 2, 2018 at 9:34 p.m.

    This lock was a bit different, in that the owner just taps it and the door unlocks, or a code is entered direclty on the lock, Mark. But your points are very well taken regarding the other issues you mentioned.

Next story loading loading..