Automakers Are Not Explaining, Selling Safety Technology

This post was previously published in an earlier edition of Drive Time.

Aside from politics, it’s hard to find a subject more divisive than self-driving vehicles. 

But what many consumers don’t understand is that if they own a car that was manufactured in the last few years, it already has features that are key components of the future generations of intelligent cars. These features aim to improve safety and convenience, as well as reduce driver errors. 

Adaptive cruise control is one such feature. It has replaced traditional cruise control on many models. The system automatically adjusts the vehicle speed to maintain a safe distance from vehicles ahead based on information from sensors. Once a vehicle moves out of the way or the driver passes it, the cruise control resumes the originally set speed. 

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety created a short video back in 2012 explaining how adaptive cruise works. In my opinion, it’s a complete godsend in stop and go traffic. I don’t have to worry about rear-ending the car in front of me if it suddenly comes to a stop, or getting rear-ended by the driver behind me.

I recently drove several vehicles in an effort to compare safety systems. The 2019 Subaru Forester system is called Eyesight Drive Assist Technology, while the 2019 Lexus UX 250h F Sport is part of the Lexus Safety System +, which includes “all-speed dynamic radar cruise control.” The 2019 Nissan Kicks I recently took for a spin didn’t have the feature, but I previously test drove a Rogue with Nissan’s ProPilot system, which does include it.

And here lies one of the problems. As of 2019, the system is called by 20 different names. Everyone wants to market their own unique system, which is understandable. But creating different names for something that consumers are only vaguely familiar with is not helping to improve awareness.

I took a poll of Facebook friends in which I asked for a simple “yes” or “no” on whether they knew what adaptive cruise control was. I disqualified friends who are automotive journalists or employed by any automaker.

I was astounded to find that 83 friends answered “no,” compared to 47 who answered “yes.” Of the 83 “no” friends, many are well-educated and include doctors, lawyers, non-automotive journalists and public relations executives.

If you extend these stats to the general population, it's safe to say automakers are missing the boat on educating consumers why they should want to buy or lease a vehicle with new technology.

J.D. Power recently found that more people are having issues with their advanced driver assistance systems, which are critical for building consumer trust in future automated vehicles.

“Having issues” is a fairly broad category. It could be as simple as consumers not understanding what’s so good about advanced driver assistance systems and being resistant to change.

One such consumer is a friend of mine, a 43-year-old veterinarian, who has very strong feelings about adaptive cruise control. She told me in great detail how she “[expletive] hates” the feature on her new Subaru and wishes she could turn it off. 

“‘I’ should be driving my car, ‘I’ should be smarter than my car,” she says. “It will NOT allow you to get near the car ahead of you. And, even if you set it to 80 mph, you can ONLY GO AS FAST AS THE CAR IN FRONT OF YOU.  Even if I PRESS THE GAS to FORCE the car to go faster, the internal car brakes are trying to balance me the ENTIRE time.

"While you can 'pace' your car ‘closer,' about the closest you can get is four car lengths away! Guess what that means when I’m cruising I-75 for 10 hours…some other [expletive] can merge into that four-car-distance spot and slow me down even more!”

Another friend, a 29-year-old who works in historic preservation, rented a Kia Soul and encountered adaptive cruise for the first time completely by accident. 

“I drove the vehicle 800+ miles for a work trip,” she says. “I was taken off-guard by the adaptive cruise control, because it was my first time in a vehicle with it. At first I thought there was something wrong with the car!

"I quickly realized that cruise control has gotten a lot smarter. It took a bit getting used to, but overall I thought it was a nice safety feature. I'll happily have the car tell me that it thinks I'm at risk of being a tailgater or that it thinks x-distance is a safer distance for stopping.” 

Even though she liked it, the fact that she didn't know what it is, indicates a huge fail for automakers.

Lincoln tries in its “Ultimate Control” spot to explain the technology in simple and visual terms using a pool table. Other automakers should take a page from Lincoln and get back to the basics of selling a vehicle’s features in a way that’s both educational and compelling.

1 comment about "Automakers Are Not Explaining, Selling Safety Technology".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. R MARK REASBECK from www.USAonly.US , July 29, 2019 at 9:50 p.m.

    article quote:

     "I don’t have to worry about rear-ending the car in front of me if it suddenly comes to a stop, or getting rear-ended by the driver behind me."

    Tanya, you are assuming the car behind you has this Take-over Cruise control.  If it doesn't,  then you're as vulnerable to get rear-ended as any other car.  I hate tail-gaters as much as anyone, but this isn't the answer.  I like the Blind spot warning, I think that is worthy of progress, but Auto-tonomous cars are the Dumbest Idea of the 21st Century.

    I agree with your (explative) friend.  Only I will be the guy who wedges into the 4 car spot if I need to.  People are going to  put too much faith in these Plastic circuit boards and sensors. They already can't parallell park because the car will do it, till the circuit boards crash, the sensors get moved or packed with snow or mud, or the car is recalled for software update.  Don't want any part of it.  Cars today are junk anyway, piles of plastic , all looking like cookie cutter design.   And after 2015, you have a black box recording everything about the car. 

    There is a surge on e-Bay for 25year and older cars, because people have a car to drive.
    I'm a baby boomer, I want a manual transmission and no electronics.  Don't care about if Facebook is on my screen, don't want to drive by McDonalds and an ad appears on my windshield, and don't want my car to automatically make my car payment or order a pizza.

    Don't know one person of any age who wants a self driving car.  And Tanya, NO ONE has ever given us an estimate of how much it adds to to the price of a car.  Volvo says it needs the equivilent to 9-15 laptops, plus sensors , radar , infrastructure...etc.....  Ain't gonna happen  .  My guess is $17,000-$22,000 per car................D.B.A.   Dead Before Arrival

Next story loading loading..