Why COVID-19 Is Very Different From 9/11

Every day, in ways large and small, 9/11 hangs in the air. Of course, the pandemic isn’t 9/11, and the differences are telling.

The 9/11 attacks killed killed 2,753 people in New York City, with a total of 2,977 people nationwide. The number of people who have died in New York City as a result of COVID-19  as of April 14 had already exceeded 10,000. 

But the differences are far more than numbers. 9/11 was in some ways far more clarifying. America was under attack. In the days that followed, New Yorkers came together.  

When I directed the film "7 Days In September,"  I remember feeling and seeing a powerful sense of unity and shared compassion in the city.

And the crowds that gathered on the West Side Highway to cheer and clap for first responders -- also as seen in the film -- is echoed in today's 7 p.m. applause for healthcare workers. But that’s where the similarities end.



As muddy as our understanding was of whom to “blame” for 9/11, still it was  a “them.” It wasn’t us.

Twenty years later, after a war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a continued fuzzy dotted line between Islamic fundamentalists and the Saudi government, we take some solace in the fact that the dangers unleashed in the attacks on the World Trade Center came from outside our borders.

COVID-19 is in the air around us. We find ourselves looking suspiciously at the unmasked dog walker, or the people who spend their days behind a mask checking out groceries, hoping they will observe social distancing. We wash our hands, we wipe down surfaces, we accept the phrase “flatten the curve” as a gentle stand-in for what it really means: slow the death rate.

As terrible as 9/11 was, it also provided a symbol for global unity. America was, for a moment, the center of global support and appreciation. Terrorism, if not stopped, would infect the globe. And so we agreed to armed conflict, a reduction in civil rights, massive surveillance of digital communication, and a blurring of the line between war and peace. 

Historians have yet to write the final chapter on America’s response to 9/11. But  there’s an argument being made that we squandered a moment when we could have built a new chapter. A connected world could have come together after 9/11 and begun to understand that some problems don’t honor borders or boundaries. Extremism exists in various forms around the planet. 

Digital connections and social media offered the promise of understanding and sharing across cultures and boundaries. Instead, it’s fueled misinformation, fake news, hate speech, and social isolation.

9/11 brought us together against a common enemy, one we could at least theoretically identify through ideology and fight with technical tools we understood. 

COVID-19 offers no such easy blame or identity. For a moment, trying to invent an enemy, the White House worked to hang the blame on China with the monicker the “Wuhan Virus.” Some members of the public heard the dog whistle, and Asian Americans paid the price. 

What does the enemy look like? For residents of Rhode Island, it was New Yorkers. For people living year-round on Long Island’s beach communities, it was Manhattan residents leaving the city to travel to their summer homes. And Trump took turns emasculating and then empowering and blaming governors, though mostly Democratic governors. 

COVID-19 is a virus that doesn’t respect borders, nationality, or ethnicity. it is communicable for days before it shows symptoms. So even if everyone who had any symptoms self-isolated, the disease would still spread through the population. It makes everyone around us dangerous.

Thinking back to 9/11, I remember the fear, the sense of invisible danger. But I also strongly remember the sense of unity, of a shared sense of resilience. We were, back then, “all in it together.” 

COVID-19 feels strangely more divisive. The U.S., Canada, France, Germany, China: We’re all in it for ourselves. Which makes the unseen danger of the virus far more ominous -- and solving it something that demands a global solution to a global pandemic.

4 comments about "Why COVID-19 Is Very Different From 9/11".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Teresa Garner from Structural Graphics, April 20, 2020 at 1:59 p.m.

    Good read until you politicized it with your personal negative opinions, which by the way, are not factual.

  2. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited, April 20, 2020 at 8:15 p.m.

    There is nothing since 1918 to compare.

  3. Stacey Schaller from SBS Advertising, April 24, 2020 at 2:32 p.m.

    Open to critique?

    First, "flatten the curve" is not "lowering the death rate." Those two terms are only marginally related, and they coincide only if a significant number of cases that need medical treatment do not receive that treatment. 

    The Death Rate is a simple calculation of (deaths/total cases). Flattening the curve merely relates to how quickly a disease is spread. The point of flattening the curve is to prevent medical services from becoming overwhelmed. 

    Second, while 10,000+ NY residents have passed from complications of the Covid-19 virus, several times that number have passed due to complications of the flu over the period of time. The flu is transmitted to same way and in the same types of conditions, and has a similar effect on elder populations. And yet, almost no one has politicized the flu like this. 

    Third, if you were held accountable of anyone else's improper reactions to any and everything you ever wrote or said, you probably would be in jail, right?

    As a writer, you (presumably) communicate your points to the best of your ability. Your readers are responsible for their own reactions. So, if the Administration identifies the virus based on where it came from, and some racists use that as an excuse to harm Asians, that is on them. If the President should be held responsible for racists' actions because of his statement, should you, then, be held responsible if someone takes a potshot at the President because of this article?

    Articles like this could be opportunities to build that unity you would like to see. It's disappointing, however, so see how the opportunity was missed. 

  4. PJ Lehrer from NYU, April 26, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.

    As the last reply clearly demonstrates American focuses too much on the me and not enough on the we.  When will we learn?  How many more have to die?

Next story loading loading..