Meta has officially informed its employees that it is killing off its biggest diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, according to an internal memo acquired by Axios.
“The legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing,” wrote Meta’s Vice President of Human Resources Janelle Gale.
“The Supreme Court of the United States has recently made decisions signaling a shift in how courts will approach DEI,” Gale continued. “The term ‘DEI’ has also become charged, in part because it is understood by some as a practice that suggests preferential treatment of some groups over others.”
advertisement
advertisement
Gale said that moving forward, Meta plans to “end efforts to source business suppliers from diverse-owned businesses.”
Meta claims that it will focus on how to apply “fair and consistent practices that mitigate bias for all, no matter your background,” despite the fact that DEI initiatives were created in response to biased work environments and hiring practices, especially with America’s evolving workforce, which will continue to diversify in the coming years.
By casting aside DEI’s inherent purpose of promising a more equitable working environment through promoting a heightened sense of empathy, understanding, and opportunity among employees, Meta is putting aside ethical considerations only to embrace conservative and even far-right ideology as president-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office.
Over the past week, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has kowtowed to Trump’s wishes, publicly announcing the end of all third-party fact-checking for content across its family of wildly popular and impactful social media apps -- a decision so clearly tied to Trump’s requests that it seems to lack all common sense, considering the real-world effects that political discussion and harmful misinformation on Facebook and Instagram have led to in years past (including the January 6 attack on the Capitol).
Meta has also replaced its president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, with prominent Republican Joel Kaplan and added Trump ally and UFC President and CEO Dana White to its board, and plans to move its content-moderation teams from the liberal-leaning state of California to the conservative-leaning state of Texas.
Social-media platforms -- especially Facebook -- have already divided citizens and inspired hateful acts across the globe, including terrorism, illegal surveillance and tampering with major political elections.
But with less content oversight, Meta’s platforms, which boast a whopping 5 billion users, will almost certainly pave the way to more hateful and destructive acts driven by unchecked, unregulated, AI-altered content.
Meta’s decision to bury DEI initiatives comes at a time when X owner Elon Musk and Donald Trump -- both of whom Zuckerberg has recently been courting -- are blaming DEI hiring practices for the devastating effects of the wildfires ripping across Los Angeles, which is proven misinformation.
A major corporation controlling the way much of the world's population communicates and accesses a variety of content and news bending to a fear-mongering political leader with a professed admiration for dictators -- and the rhetoric being endorsed by Fox News, a media source that sets objective “reporting” aside to prioritize far-right propaganda -- is not only incredibly dangerous to democracies across the globe, but to the mental health of everyday users (especially younger users), advertisers, and marginalized groups.
If simply claiming that DEI initiatives and “wokeness” are the cause for devastating California wildfires -- claims that distract from the proliferation of life-saving news updates and even result in violence against front-line workers -- can immediately prevent victims from receiving help while their homes burn around them, any level of destruction in the new age of social media is now possible.
Mr. Kirkland,
You wrote, '...both of whom Zuckerberg has recently been courting -- are blaming DEI hiring practices for the devastating effects of the wildfires ripping across Los Angeles, which is proven misinformation,'
Could you kindly provide how DEI has proven not to be factored in the devastating inferno overtaking Los Angeles?
Kind Regards,
Mark
"considering the real-world effects that political discussion"
Yes, we must ban political discussion and imprison anybody that does that.
Also, do you consider MSNBC and CNN as a danger to democracies across the world?
I have never commented here, but I could not let a bigoted comment stand. To need proof that DEI is not a factor in disaster response is indeed to assume that only white straight people are best qualified. The far right wing influencers have been pushing that suggestion falsely and a simple google search will show you many articles that illustrate that with direct quotes. Try these, Mark: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/10/rightwing-misinformation-los-angeles-fire
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/nx-s1-5252757/california-wildfires-dei-diversity-influencers-firefighters
Also, could you kindly provide proof that the infernal fire was not a Chinese plot to take over California, or that those strange lights seen in the sky just moments before the fire started were not alien spacecraft sending the fire as a preliminary phase to their upcoming invasion?
Do you also have proof that no witchcraft was involved in sending the hurricanes, and that no demonic agency has been spotted near the fires?
In fact, please provide all proofs of everything that did not cause the fire, so that we, your readers, have enough information to provide our own evaluation of what happened.
Aye, that's sarcasm. But what else would you expect, with such a question?
The entire MP staff has
There is so much hyperbole and inaccuracy in this post.
Most of the commentary published by the MP staff these days illustrates that the entire staff has lost its collective mind and cannot objectively evaluate anything in the industey without a bias.
FFS. Do better and get back to reporting and commenting on what's going on on the industry instead of pushing ideological bullshit.
So much hyperbole in this piece it's so bias. Businesses should hire the best person for the job it shouldn't be just to check a box just to check the box and shouldn't matter the skin color of anyone in my opinion.
The government has no right to tell social media platforms to censor stuff they don't like that is censorship and violates the 1ST Amendment that little thing called free speech which Mark Zuckerberg could've sued the government and won. If I owned a social media platform the government told me to take down an article I'd say no and I'd say see you in court for violating free speech laws and the 1ST amendment the Biden Admin had no right to tell FB to take down post and Zuckerberg shouldn't have done it. Censorship is wrong on all levels in my opinion.
Picking on Fox News should go after CNN & MSNBC which is the worse of the worse when it comes to cable news as they post disinformation and misinformation as well. Which is in the eye of the beholder can't put the paste back into the tube that ship has sailed.