Commentary

The End Was Inevitable For CBS Radio News

Much is being made in recent days of the nearly 100-year history of CBS Radio News in the wake of the news late last week that CBS is shutting the unit down for good.

But that’s the thing: Radio news as represented by CBS News is history.

News on the radio? It’s like having press releases delivered to a TV columnist by fax machine.

The new powers-that-be who are calling the shots at CBS News -- most notably editor in chief Bari Weiss and the man she reports to, Paramount CEO David Ellison -- have apparently come to the conclusion that CBS Radio has no potential for future growth in a digital world powered by video, not audio. 

To them, CBS Radio is just another vestigial legacy medium in which they have no grounding or sentiment.

advertisement

advertisement

Many of the stories that came out over the weekend that reported the end of CBS Radio News were styled in the manner of obituaries. 

Sorrowful observers and veterans of radio news mourned the news like a death. “This is another part of the landscape that has fallen off into the sea. It’s a loss for the country and for the industry,” said one quotable personage.

“It’s another piece of America that is gone,” lamented Dan Rather, 94, when he was reached by an NPR reporter.

Edward R. Murrow and his famous radio broadcasts from London during the blitz were evoked all over the place. 

They deserve their place in the history of broadcast news, but World War II happened a long, long time ago.

The end came suddenly. The news broke on Friday that an announcement had been made internally at CBS that the radio news unit would be shuttered and all employees laid off.

It became effective immediately on Friday. One pictures a newsroom filled with news staff in the morning and by evening, nothing left but someone’s uneaten lunch left in the breakroom fridge.

Weiss and CBS News President Tom Cibrowski reportedly delivered the bad news via a companywide memo, evidently choosing not to deliver such bad news in person. Perhaps neither of them knew where the CBS Radio newsroom was.

“Radio is woven into the fabric of CBS News and that’s always going to be part of our history,” said a statement attributed to Weiss, whose own history with CBS News began less than six months ago.

“I want you to know that we did everything we could, including before I joined the company, to try and find a viable solution to sustain the radio operation,” she said, sounding like a surgeon who just lost a patient.

Except for whatever was left of CBS Radio News when it closed last Friday, CBS was for all intents and purposes already out of the radio business, having jettisoned the last of its radio stations in 2017 during the reign of Les Moonves. 

I am willing to bet that members of our younger generations do not really know what a radio is, or a fax machine or a street-corner mailbox. 

They might not recognize real news reporting when they hear it either, but that is something they will have to deal with in their own time, not mine.

The last star of CBS Radio was probably Charles Osgood, who died in 2024 at age 91. He did his own self-styled commentaries -- “The Osgood File” -- on CBS Radio from 1971 to 2017, and hosted “CBS News Sunday Morning” on CBS Television from 1994 to 2016.

Signing off of the TV show every Sunday, he was famous for saying, “Until then, I’ll see you on the radio.”

5 comments about "The End Was Inevitable For CBS Radio News".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Dan C. from MS Entertainment, March 24, 2026 at 1:52 p.m.

    I understand this is commentary, but the overt ad hominem attacks against Weiss and her boss are eye roll worthy.


    Anyone with a business sense can understand that you cannot substantiate the amount of overhead to support such an effort when there is no demand for terrestrial radio where advertising CPMs are in the toilet and will not return.


    Gone is the town cryer, newswire over fax, ticker tape, many cable TV networks, many newspapers....yes, the evolution of how people get their information evolves.


    Two things can be true at the same time - CBS Radio News is historically significant and CBS Radio News no longer serves the purpose it used to and most people under the age of 40 probably have no idea who Edward R. Murrow or Dan Rather or Walter Cronkite is.


    Most probably have no idea who SCott Pelley is.  Hell, I had to google to know that Tony Dokoupil anchors CBS broadcast news.


     

  2. Brian McKendrick from IBM replied, March 24, 2026 at 11:09 p.m.

    It's great you can say that with a straight face - your comment was hard to read with my eyes so far back in my head.  There is still a market for news radio - I'll agree it's reach and value are on the decline.  What's dying is journalist integrity - whatever tiny shred that's even lett - as well as the freedom of the press and speech.  Weiss is a puppet and has never been confused as either a serious journalist or media executive.  Trump has been clear in his position when it comes to how the news should be reported and the suppression (in the case of CBS news, regime change) of news outlets that  deviate from his world view.  This is just amputating another appendage of professional journalism - and just another chance for the Human Buffalo Wing to flex, feel mighty.  Meanwhile, dedicated employees with decades, centuries of collective experience lost their jobs with little warning.  As a country, another part of our history paved over and plated with fake gold.

  3. Darrin Stephens from McMann & Tate, March 25, 2026 at 1:57 p.m.

    Uhh, the end was not "effective immediately on Friday." CBS radio continues to produce top-of-the-hour newscasts thru May.

  4. Dan C. from MS Entertainment replied, March 25, 2026 at 3:30 p.m.

    @Brian - So your position is that it is Trump that has caused CBS News ratings to sink to their lowest levels in decades?  Far behind their competitors?  CBS Radio News AQH ratings are in the toilet because Trump is the president?  Have you seen CBS Nightly News ratings?  This is Trump's fault?


    Your argument about integrity is counter-intuitive.  You can easily argue that the lack of journalistic integrity has led to legacy media's demise - which is proven poll after poll about the American viewer's confidence in the legacy media networks - the forcing of narratives and the forcing of ideological driven commentary vs. delivering the facts and letting the viewer decide is what has led to historic distrust in the public's eyes when it comes to legacy news media.


    How convenient all of you eye rollers ignore the fact that all of the media outlets and social networks testified in congressional hearings that it was the Biden administration that made threats to close them down and threaten them if they did not supress facts about Covid, its origins, problems with the vaccines, and alternative ways to stay healthy.


    You're making a counter-intuitive emotional argument when it's a business decision.  It's very easy to tell others to keep a sinking ship afloat when it's not your money and blaming Trump for legacy news ratings reaching historic lows indicates you are driven by your own ideology vs. the reality of running a business.

  5. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, March 25, 2026 at 6:13 p.m.

    Dan, you are no doubt correct that Trump didn't kill CBS's radio news operation. What everyone is ignoring is there isn't enough listening  to support the number  of radio stations that were launched  in the 1970s-2000 period. AM/FM radio listening time is down but the number of radio stations competing for listeners has tripled  and radio news delivers a mostly older audience which is easily reached via TV.  So CBS radio was undoubtedly either barely breaking even or a money loser  and now it's gone. There simply isn't enough spare advertiser money  lying around to fund it  profitably any longer.

    As for the CBS TV weeknight news here, also, we see the same problem. Three nightly newscasts --all featuring basically the same information ---worked when an average person devoted four hours a day to linear TV and cable news was still evolving while there was no internet, social media, etc. But now, the the average adult watches only two not four hours of linear TV daily so there are fewer nightly viewers available. The problem is that all three broadcast TV networks feel constrained to continue with their evening news reports as a matter of prestige and, to be fair, they still attract a fairly large collective audience--albeit mainly a 55+ audience.

    I think that CBS made a mistake installingt a young guy as its host--or main anchor. Like it or not, heavy news consumers are and always have need older adults. Also, were I CBS, I'd be investigating a time change so as not  to compete directly with NBC and ABC--as well as new casting and formatting ideas. Why must all three networks run their early evening news at exactly the same time? What would happen if CBS moved to an earlier time slot--say at 6PM--assuming that the affiliates would agree to this? Would that oblige NBC and ABC to make a similar move? Who knows--but what's to lose by thinking out of the box? Moving to 6PM is an idea that could be tested--in a few local markets--in my opinion.

Next story loading loading..