OPA: Premium Content Sites Worth Extra Bucks

Pam Horan President of OPAAdvertisers have long sought to determine just how the placement of an ad affects its impact on viewers.

A new report to be released today by the Online Publishing Association found that ad effectiveness scores on premium content sites were numerically higher than on the Web in general. Those conclusions were drawn after analyzing independent Dynamic Logic MarketNorms data.

"The results show that ads on what the OPA considers to be higher-quality ad environments are more effective with consumers," said Pam Horan, president of the Online Publishing Association. "Quality was a key point of differentiation."

The strong showing for these sites swept across nearly all measurements and outscored industry norms for the Internet in 47 out of 47 advertising metrics.

The new report, "Improving Ad Performance Online," is the second in a series of OPA reports leveraging Dynamic Logic's MarketNorms database.

Both reports look at ad effectiveness scores for high-quality, original content sites, compared with those for overall MarketNorms, portals and ad networks .p> Since the first report in July, aided brand awareness scores on OPA member sites have increased 38%, while scores on ad networks have declined 19%.

Similarly, brand favorability scores for OPA member sites have risen 27%, while ad networks, portals and MarketNorms have dropped 29%, 17% and 6%, respectively.

The new data also shows that younger audiences (18- to-34-year-olds) are about twice as likely to form favorable opinions about advertised brands on OPA member sites than on portals and MarketNorms.

"We found the data regarding younger audiences particularly interesting because of their social networking activity," Horan added.

And the same trend holds true for affluent audiences, where OPA member sites are estimated to be 94% more effective at impacting brand favorability than MarketNorms, and 118% more effective at impacting brand awareness.

4 comments about "OPA: Premium Content Sites Worth Extra Bucks".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Randy Peterson from P&G, January 8, 2009 at 8:26 a.m.
  2. Joshua White from Jedd Nickerson Enterprises, January 8, 2009 at 9:29 a.m.

    Yes, thank you for the information, but do you have a list of these sites? Or at least the top 10?

    Sincerely,
    Josh White

    Marketing Consultant

  3. Joe Fredericks, January 8, 2009 at 10:52 a.m.

    The problem with the OPA is they are thinking near term not long term. And do are there member organizations. The problem is not ad networks. It's how to best monetize the gobs of unsold inventory on large content sites.

    Let's be clear. There biggest competition are the millions of smaller niche content sites not ad networks. Eventually, the publisher will have to turn to the exchange model if they haven't already to strike a balance between the efforts of their direct sales team and the opportunity afforded by ad networks.

    Joe
    http://www.adexchanger.com

  4. Stephen Peace from Vizeum, August 13, 2009 at 4:46 p.m.

    It would be interesting to understand if the lift in effectiveness is proportional or greater to the lift in cost advertisers have to pay at premium content sites.

Next story loading loading..