Commentary

Should Advertisers Play A Role In The Privacy Debate?

Now that behavioral targeting has become more pervasive (and more effective), it is being talked about not only by publishers and advertisers, but also by privacy advocates -- organizations like the NAI and IAB and, in Washington, the FTC.

At issue is if BT players are doing enough to disclosure to consumers how BT works and offering them the opportunity to opt out of being tracked by BT vendors and publishers. There has been much discussion about how to regulate behavioral marketers; but no solution that satisfies everyone.

The BT industry so far has contended that website privacy policies are sufficient disclosure since many of them contain links to opts out opportunities like the NAI site. Google and Bluekai have announced 'preference pages' or registries that allow Web users to say what type of BT they are interested in receiving. But, the other, more common option is to put that information in the Privacy Policy of the site. But the problem with that is that no matter where disclosures are placed on the service provider's site, most people won't ever see them. How will a customer visiting Retail SiteX know that Company Y is going to use their browsing behavior to later display relevant ads to them as they surf the Web on Network Z? The average customer won't. The only way a customer will know what forms of BT advertisers are using is if the advertisers themselves tell them.

I think that it's time for advertisers to step up in this privacy debate. Thus far the pressure for disclosure has been placed on networks, behavioral marketing providers and publishers. The key players in those industries have done a good job of becoming more transparent (though there is still work ahead of us), while advertisers haven't been asked to do anything. Advertisers are clearly benefiting from behavioral marketing, and its time they disclosed what type of behavioral marketing they participate in, and allow customers to opt-out. How they do this is open for discussion: Tag each ad with an opt-out of future ads from the same company? Put a notice on manufacturer's page with the headline "Did You Know We Are Tracking You?" that links to a kinder, gentler explanation?

How should an advertiser disclose that information?

We at FetchBack have asked advertisers we work with to include information in their privacy policy that says they utilize retargeting services, and provide a link to NAI to opt-out of FetchBack's retargeting network. We feel it's an important step for any organization involved in behavioral marketing to take; at least if the industry is serious about being more transparent and self-regulating.

3 comments about "Should Advertisers Play A Role In The Privacy Debate?".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Mark Zagorski from eXelate, April 6, 2009 at 9:47 a.m.

    Chad --

    Great insight. It is clear that the responsibility for consumer privacy can't be borne by any one player. Advertisers, publishers, BT service co's and even agencies need to play a role if we are to address the issue in a real way.

    The challenge will be to get all of the interests aligned and to agree to a simple cohesive plan that will engage everyone -- an impossibility in the minds of many who believe that bringing all together would be akin to the Red Sox and Yankees having a tea party on the Steinbrenner Yacht.

    But, unless we show a unified face soon, our ship could sail -- helmed by the FTC.

    Also -- just a heads up that eXelate also does our part by offering a consumer preference management page http://www.exelate.com/new/consumers-optoutpreferencemanager.html

    Mark Zagorski
    CRO
    eXelate

  2. John Grono from GAP Research, April 6, 2009 at 10:11 a.m.

    Remove the demand and the supply will diminish ?

  3. John Berard from Credible Context, April 7, 2009 at 12:11 p.m.

    The interests of all are the responsibility of all. The value more relevant advertising creates for consumer, publisher and advertiser can only be delivered systematically.

    But it begins with notice. And notice can't be buried in a policy or offered one time or upfront and never again. It needs to be persistent notice. And that burden most appropriately falls to advertisers. After all, they are taking advantage of the consumer data file and ought to let us know by tagging those ads.

    Some are already up to the task. The advantage is clear; even pop-ups will work if the ad is relevant.

Next story loading loading..