Google Argues Street View Cars Did Not Violate Privacy Laws

Arguing that it broke no laws, Google is asking a judge to dismiss a potential class-action lawsuit stemming from the company's collection of data sent over WiFi networks.

"It is not unlawful under the Wiretap Act to receive information from networks that are configured so that communications sent over them are "readily accessible to the general public," Google says in papers filed late last week with the U.S. District Court James Ware in San Jose, Calif.

The lawsuit stems from Google's admission earlier this year that its Street View cars collected payload data -- including URLs, passwords and emails -- sent over unencrypted WiFi networks. Google apologized for the interception and said it intended to destroy the data. Nonetheless, the company's acknowledgment triggered investigations abroad and in the U.S. about whether Google violated privacy laws, including the federal wiretap law.

Google's statements also resulted in more than a dozen potential class-action lawsuits, which were consolidated into one case now pending in federal court in San Jose. The lawsuits allege that Google violated various laws, including the federal wiretap, by collecting the payload data.



The federal wiretap law generally makes it unlawful to collect data from networks that are not password protected, but contains some exceptions for open networks -- including one for broadcasts transmitted by common carrier. Google argues that exception doesn't apply because Internet service providers aren't regulated as common carriers by the Federal Communications Commission.

In a related development, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal reportedly said Friday that Google had refused to comply with a subpoena to disclose the data it collected. Blumenthal is heading a multi-state investigation into whether Google violated any laws by intercepting WiFi data.

1 comment about "Google Argues Street View Cars Did Not Violate Privacy Laws ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Chris Nielsen from Domain Incubation, December 20, 2010 at 9:36 a.m.

    Google should not have been collecting the data they found and that activity should be explained, but Google is not a hacker (that we know of).

    What, are people suing so they can get money to make their WI-FI networks secure???!!!

    Now that we know hackers can start driving around town and find unsecured networks all over the place, maybe that should be the common focus of this problem, and not the messenger, ya think?

Next story loading loading..