Infiniti, Lincoln: Same Goals, Different Languages

Lincoln-ALuxury automakers are focusing both on old-fashioned relationships at the dealership, and high-technology differentiators, but not so much on the less tangible aspects of brand equity. Nowadays “intangible” is a nice way of saying amorphous. 

Ford's Lincoln division demonstrates that understanding better than a lot of luxury brands. It's a brand new brand except for the name. Wait -- even the name has changed: It's Lincoln Motor Company. The company has no choice but to start from scratch in vehicle design, technology, and brand identity. But the Ford division has a few things in common with another luxury automaker -- Infiniti -- although the two on the surface could not have less in common (besides one being domestic, the other the Japanese luxury division of Nissan Motor.)



Chief marketers for the two brands plus Michelle Morris, auto industry director at Google, talked about the premium sector at the J.D. Power 2013 Automotive Forum on Tuesday. She pointed out right up front that you can pretty much forget about counting on loyal buyers these days, unless those buyers are over 60. "Younger buyers are more open-minded," she said. "Gen Y, who have $200 billion in buying power, are looking at four-plus brands when they shop, doing a lot of cross shopping, and are after 'whole experience'."

In other words, these shoppers are far more likely to get their computer at the Apple Store instead of Best Buy if only because the experience is way better. Sorry, Best Buy. No different when it comes to apparel. "When you go to Burberry's site, they show you what the inside of their stores look like." The brand is also, basically, its own content company.

Both Infiniti, which moved to Hong Kong and is redoing its vehicle nomenclature, and Lincoln, which created a new agency in New York -- HudsonRouge -- are throwing out the old furniture. Matt VanDyke, global director of marketing, sales and service for Lincoln, said Morris' reiteration about declining brand loyalty is good news for the brand. 

"We are really at the very early stages of a transformation, starting with product and global expansion," he said. "We had really lost a generation of the luxury market and we acknowledge that we came off the radar, now as we reinvent we have to tap into what's important to new customers." He said the fact that a new generation of luxury buyers are less ostentatious and not so concerned with the name on the grill is a help to Lincoln. "They want understated luxury. Customer service and dealership experience is now more important. And consumers say no brand is meeting that right now." 

There's a big focus across market segments on console-based entertainment and information systems, but Ben Poore, Infiniti's VP,  said Infiniti had to work on how to talk about less obvious technology, such as its back-up collision avoidance system introduced in the JX crossover. "We struggled with how to communicate that when we launched the JX; we tested the system by putting toy fire engines, cozy coops, toys behind it and it just emotionally smacked dead center in customers' lives." Ads showed a JX backing out of a driveway and stopping just short of colliding with a small child on a bicycle. "We put technology in the context of someone's life and had a story. it's fruitful. Customers say 'I want that, it makes sense to me'." 

He said safety technology allows it to redefine performance beyond speed, torque and handling. "We are known for performance, but you have to go beyond that." As for infotainment systems that let drivers connect smartphone capability with onboard interfaces, the critical thing is simplicity. "I think this is a group who have always known technology is critical. So simpler is better, but any technology has to work to make something better or it won't take."

1 comment about "Infiniti, Lincoln: Same Goals, Different Languages".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Richard Truesdell from Automotive Traveler, March 27, 2013 at 12:25 p.m.

    Unfortunately Lincoln's problems go far deeper than the dealership experience. Each and everyone of their vehicles, including the new MKZ, are re-trimmed versions of Ford products now sharing the same showroom. This is Lincoln's fundamental problem.

    Contrast this to Cadillac which this morning introduced the third-generation 2014 Cadillac CTS, a car that doesn't share its platform with any other non-Cadillac vehicle. It's styling is distinctive, not trying to emulate Audi, BMW, Infiniti, Lexus, or Mercedes-Benz. It's bold, edgy and stands out in the crowded automotive luxury marketplace.

    Once Lincoln stood for the epitome of American luxury, what does it stand for now? Case in point is the currently running TV commercial for the new 2013 Lincoln MKZ that shares its basic platform with the hot-selling Ford Fusion. The commercial starts out with a Lincoln Town Car morphing into the new MKZ. The problem with that is that most people associate the Town Car with the black sedan that takes you to and from the airport, not an aspirational luxury car.

    Lincoln missed the opportunity to associate the re-launch of the brand with the great Lincolns of the past, cars like the elegant 1961 Lincoln Continental 4-door sedan. This was a car whose design was a breakthrough and has stood the test of time asa modern classic.

    While I am an automotive journalist, I follow the marketing of automobiles closely. And as this is a marketing blog, what more can we say about Lincoln's Super Bowl misfire where their two commercials were among the lowest rated (by the USA Today Ad Meter) ads from any auto manufacturer?

    In trying to reach new buyers, The Lincoln Motor Company, as it is now named, has all but abandoned their traditional buyers. What's wrong with appealing to older buyers (who have money to spend) while reaching out to new buyers, for whom the brand is totally off their radar?

Next story loading loading..