If you've been watching the news lately, you may have noticed the bleak headlines about teen unemployment. “Teen employment hits record lows,”
one article states. "The lost generation," another article proclaims about today’s youth.
The numbers aren’t pretty. The
share of unemployed 16 to 24 year olds not in school is at 17.1%, according to July’s job report.
That’s up from 11% six years ago. More senior citizens choose to work later
into their retirement, which contributes to teens having a harder time getting entry-level jobs, now that overqualified, older people continue to stay in the workforce.
This high unemployment rate among young adults is having a very tangible effect on both their livelihood and popular retail brands. Consider the
following:
- Teen-apparel retailers reported very disappointing sales. Recently, Abercrombie & Fitch posted dismal second-quarter
results, driving share prices down. Competitors American Eagle and Aeropostale also stumbled.
- The
back-to-school shopping season was a bit disappointing. After a historic 2012, Americans pared back their back-to-school spending, according to the National Retail Federation.
- Some high-budget teen movies tanked this summer, while older moviegoers have driven the success of a few
surprising hits (like “The Butler”).
advertisement
advertisement
These issues
aren’t just brought on by rising teen unemployment. Student loans, which have topped $1.2 trillion, compound the issues. The student loan
situation is so bad that it prompted President Obama to sign new student loan
interest rate legislation into law recently.
The implications of these dismal trends for brands are enormous. If teens are taking on
a lot of debt to go to school and cannot find part-time work, they have less disposable income for movies, eating out, clothing, video games, and almost anything outside their bare necessities. The
fight for brands’ share of wallet is fiercer than ever before.
The effects of high teen unemployment could also have a long-term
effect for brands. For instance, in the TV industry, if young consumers are tapped out financially—and if they can find the same content online for free or nearly free—then they are less
likely to ever subscribe to cable after moving out. It’s possible we’re raising a generation of “cord-nevers,” a group of consumers who grow accustomed to never subscribing to
cable and paying the $75-$150 a month for TV service.
To adapt to this crisis, brands need a better grasp of consumer preferences in areas
that affect them. Marketers need a deeper understanding of the macro issues affecting teens and young adults as consumers, but they also need to do more consumer insight work to understand the
pressures teens are under. Much of what marketers know about Millennials is more about the older cohort, a group that largely made it out of college before the bottom fell out of the labor market.
It’s time for marketers to re-examine their assumptions about this generation within the context of today’s economic realities.
Despite these discouraging numbers, the future isn’t all doom and gloom. The economy continues to incrementally improve and as MTV found out recently, younger Millennials are showing
signs of resilience, adapting the necessary skills to survive the sobering
realities of today. Some businesses such as those in the restaurant industry are already thinking outside
the box to reach Millennials. Marketers can bet that the kids will be all right…eventually. But, now that money is an object for this generation of consumers, it’s more important
than ever for marketers to do careful research to figure out how to remain relevant.