In The Drink

Until last week, it was just a series of rumblings. The allegations were of horrible episodes, but they simply didn’t penetrate the mantle of achievement, riches and accumulated goodwill of the groundbreaking icon. To dwell on the dirt would require you to see a hero as a monster. Now we have to answer hard questions about events, and about ourselves.

What will we tolerate when we are in the thrall of genius, and what will we be willing to look away from? Will we make feeble excuses for the culprit? Will we blame the young women, victims of both casual sexism and chilling violation?

I speak, of course, of Uber.

What a revolutionary idea. What a great service. What a darling of the investment community. What a bunch of frat boy creeps in charge.

The latest eruption of adolescent id came with the dinner-table musing, by Executive Vice President Emil Michael, about spending $1 million to hire reporters and political “opposition researchers” to dig up dirt on journalists who have criticized the company. According to BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith, who broke the story, the main target would have been PandoDaily editor Sarah Lacy.



Key words from Michael’s meditation on such investigations, as quoted by Smith: “your personal lives, your families.”

And why was Uber upset with Lacy? Because she had the temerity to call them out on a jaw-droppingly sexist rider promotion, in which men could get an Uber pickup in Lyon, France, from a hot “model” provided by the agency Avions de Chasse, which explained the opportunity thusly:

“Avions de chasse” is the French term for “fighter jets”, but also the colloquial term to designate an incredibly hot chick. Lucky you! the world’s most beautiful “Avions” are waiting for you on this app. Seat back, relax and let them take you on cloud 9!

Putting aside the sordid notion of car service as escort service, what this implied about the sexual availability of female drivers -- a vibe perhaps transferrable to female passengers -- drew the ire of Sarah Lacy. She said she no longer felt safe in an Uber car and would delete the app from her phone.

Did the company apologize? No. It fantasized about smearing Lacy. And there is no reason to think those fantasies weren’t a genuine action plan. Earlier, Uber New York General Manager Josh Moher used the company’s master traffic application to track the trip of a female reporter en route to his office -- an invasion of privacy apparently routine at the company.

Should that creep women out. I dunno. Although CEO Travis Kalanick took to calling the company “Boober,” because his fame and fortune were getting him so much Avions de Chasse.

This puerile misbehavior adds up. And the coming few months will determine how much -- as measured in billions of dollars. We dwell, after all, in the Relationship Era. As in all previous commercial epochs, success requires that you have the goods. But the goods are no longer evaluated by the public solely on their intrinsic qualities. You are also being judged on your values and your corporate conduct, and those judgments are the currency of social media. Oh, and they live there -- and on Google -- in perpetuity. Longevity tip: if you want to be successful in the long term, don’t let a Google search of your brand name turn up “misogynist swines.”

Till the past week or so, the Uber schweine were actually unterhunde. The target of taxi companies, drivers and municipalities, the company has continued to brave mass demonstrations and onerous legislation with the full knowledge that it is a better mousetrap. Yes, it is very bad for the status quo, but -- as they say -- is the toll of progress. Though the taxi industry is heavily regulated, it is also sloppy and exploitative. Cabbies are overworked, undercompensated and labor at great risk. Consequently, some of their number are chiselers or other category of menace.

Uber’s model not only provides for faster pickup, but the expensive dispatcher middleman is replaced by a phone app. Drivers keep more of the fare revenue, riders (usually) pay less, customer-service incentives are baked in and each trip is tracked to promote safety and limit disputes. It just works, and works well, which explains the panic in the incumbent industry and the $18 billion valuation.

So, yeah, they have the goods. But they also have a growing case of the bads. The New York Times has already described the phenomenon of “Uber shame,” using a service you find morally suspect. There is also a burgeoning “delete uber” movement that could snowball into a meme. Behavior has consequences. (See: Cosby, Bill) And thus -- stratospheric valuation or no, hot co-pilot or no -- could this high-flying startup head a tailspin and wind up in the drink.

By the way, entitled rich dudes: There’s no app for that.


6 comments about "In The Drink".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Ruth Barrett from, November 24, 2014 at 2:48 p.m.

    Thanks for this. Misogynist swines seems apt. And more of us are choosing to fore go services and goods for values and sustainability.

  2. Nicholas Fiekowsky from (personal opinion), November 24, 2014 at 4:24 p.m.

    How much slack was cut for a politician with persistent back-stories of exploitation and harrassment? How fierce was the outrage when victims were smeared as, "Trailer park trash?" Where did the wagons circle when new charges surfaced and were substantiated? How much was the post-politics career impaired?

    Could be the bar is set differently for those in the correct club.

  3. Bob Garfield from MediaPost, November 24, 2014 at 4:35 p.m.

    Yeah, Nicholas, Clinton got such a free ride: two years of his every lie and trespass recounted daily over the fold on page one in every newspaper in the world, plus getting impeached by the U.S. Senate.
    By the way, since you don't seem to be able to consider one subject without reflexively raising an entirely unrelated one, you might just remind yourself this: nobody has ever accused Clinton of rape.

  4. Adam Kleinberg from Traction, November 24, 2014 at 5:18 p.m.

    Bob... you'd appreciate this.

    This will be written about in text books as a case study for unbranding.

  5. Kaya Hund from KayasPR, November 24, 2014 at 6:09 p.m.

    "Behavior has consequences. (See: Cosby, Bill)" OR -- Behavior doesn't always have (negative) consequences -- See: Clinton, Bill.

  6. Bob Garfield from MediaPost, November 24, 2014 at 6:16 p.m.

    Another Clinton hater! No consequences????????

    See "Yeah, Nicholas" above

Next story loading loading..