Right-Wing Sites Not Being Left Behind By Mainstream Ones

Listening to the chatter from President Trump and some of his supporters on the right, it would be logical to conclude that conservative websites are struggling to attract sizable audiences.  After all, how can they compete effectively against mainstream media rivals when Google’s search results are supposedly rigged against them and powerful social platforms are censoring conservative opinion?

Sounds logical, right?  Just one thing: Traffic to leading right-wing websites often exceeds visits to more traditional mainstream news and information sites.  I know because for the past year, I’ve been tracking audience visits to conservative websites for TheRighting, which follows and studies right-wing media.

When I first began analyzing conservative websites, not only was I knocked back on my heels by the sheer daily editorial output coming from the right, I was also astonished by the size of the audiences for the sites I studied.

advertisement

advertisement

I don’t want to diminish the power of cable’s Fox News or right-wing talk radio, but the vast breadth of right-wing websites combined with their ability to attract large audiences -- with many attracting anywhere from 10 to 70 million audience visits a month  --  make them impossible to ignore when considering their influence over a large part of the voting population.  

Furthermore, the philosophy of some of our political leaders on the right — including our Tweeter-in-Chief  — are often constructed from the opinions and conclusions of the articles posted on these websites.  

Need proof? Trump’s claim that Google was purposely burying conservative news outlets favoring his administration in its search results was based on a controversial Aug. 25 article on the right-wing website PJ Media.   

PJ Media regularly lands on the list of TheRighting’s top 20 conservative websites of the month, averaging roughly 12 million to 14 million audience visits a month.  Not enough to be a top five conservative website, but it certainly holds its own.  

PJ Media generated about the same number of audience visits in July as that feisty upstart Fortune, which has been around like forever.  Be sure to send the publisher a birthday card next year in celebration of the magazine’s 90th birthday.

This is just one small example demonstrating that right-wing websites often have bigger digital footprints than mainstream news brands founded decades ago.  

There are at least a dozen conservative websites generating more than 10 million audience visits a month, including Breitbart, The Daily Caller, Infowars, The Daily Wire, TheBlaze, Townhall and PJ Media.  

For the sake of argument, let’s for the moment focus on two of the more controversial conservative sites: Breitbart and Infowars.  

Breitbart has ranked as the number-two conservative website in terms of audience visits (to Fox News — more on that later) for so long that we might have to start calling it Pepsi.  Or Pence.  Its grip on second place has not even been remotely challenged.

Furthermore, Breitbart generates more monthly audience visits than many well-known news and information sites.  Take Politico, for instance.  Breitbart topped Politico’s audience visits in July by seven million visits.  

How about The New Yorker?  Does anyone need a reminder about the magazine’s highly publicized role in exposing the sexual predations of movie producer Harvey Weinstein, which turned investigative reporter Ronan Farrow into a national publishing brand?  

Breitbart generates about double the monthly audience visits of The New Yorker.   In fact, audience visits to Breitbart exceed some of the most renowned media outlets in the country.  

While the much-maligned Infowars attracts only about a third of Breitbart’s audience visits, Infowars leaves many blue-chip media brands in the digital dust.  

In July, Infowars generated two million more visits than Today.com.  Newspaper websites from major metropolitan dailies like The Boston Globe, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Newsday all lag behind Infowars by at least a few million monthly visits.   

I’ve created the chart below to help illustrate my points (right-wing sites are capped and boldfaced).  Granted, the choices I’ve made are somewhat random.  Plenty of mainstream news and information sites draw more visits than Breitbart like CNN, CBS News, and even Rotten Tomatoes.  But of all the U.S. websites — and that includes the likes of Google, Facebook, Craigslist and Walmart — Breitbart ranked 170 for the month of July.  That is some serious reach.

If there’s a bias against conservative websites, it hasn’t stopped the onslaught of publishers from launching new digital media outlets for right-wing audiences. This has happened relatively quietly over the last 15 years (I’ve compiled an A-Z guide on my website) and they clearly outnumber the number of overtly liberal news websites like Daily Kos and Talking Points Memo.  Plus, let’s not forget the websites from prominent right-wing personalities like Sarah Palin, Pat Buchanan and Bill O’Reilly that feature commentary and original reporting.  Few liberal leaders have gone this route.  

And in case you’re wondering about Foxnews.com, in July it recorded 357 million audience visits, making it the most visited conservative website of the month. Was traffic to Foxnews.com diminished by so-called suppression of search results or censoring of conservative opinion?  Could it have pulled even larger audiences if a liberal finger wasn’t allegedly on the scale? Who knows?  

But one thing is certain:  Foxnews.com’s July audience visits surpassed both The Washington Post (188 million) and The New York Times (325 million), proving that millions of people were able to find the conservative voice they were looking for.

If there’s a bias against conservative news from tech giants conspiring in the dark, it hasn’t affected the ability of right-wing websites to draw huge audiences month after month.  In fact, it’s readily apparent that conservative websites are flourishing in the light of day, right under our noses.


Media website

*July 2018 audience visits

 

 

BREITBART

64,460,000

Politico

59,000,000

LA Times

46,820,000

The Atlantic

41,610,000

Time Magazine

44,450,000

Slate

35,380,000

THE DAILY CALLER

31,290,000

The New Yorker

31,170,000

The New York Daily News

28,620,000

Newsweek

27,590,000

THE DAILY WIRE

27,280,000

Daily Kos

27,140,000

National Geographic

23,460,000

New York Magazine

23,440,000

Esquire

20,710,000

INFOWARS

18,880,000

Today.com

16,910,000

The Boston Globe

14,120,000

Vanity Fair

14,940,000

THEBLAZE

13,560,000

PJ MEDIA

13,530,000

Fortune

13,460,000

Salon

13,250,000

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

12,280,000

Talking Points Memo

10,330,000

Newsday

   5,630,000

*Source: SimilarWeb

1 comment about "Right-Wing Sites Not Being Left Behind By Mainstream Ones".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. John Grono from GAP Research, September 5, 2018 at 7:12 p.m.

    Interestinf article Howard.

    By "audience visits" I assume you added the word "audience" because what I can see from their website they call it "estimated visits".

    If so, those numbers are the cumulative volume of traffic which has been repeately shown to be a very poor proxy for audience.

    Take for example, the sites at the top - they are around the 60m mark.   First question is, is that the total global traffic or 'washed' to be domestic (i.e. US only in this case).   Let's assume it is domestic.   That 60m is across the 30 days of a month - so averaging 2m per day.   Given the 'core' audience is probably extremely loyal they are liable to be daily users.

    It is reasonably fair to compare 'within' these metrics but please note that they should NOT be compared to other metrics such as TV, radio, print and press which use an average audience measure rather than a cumulative audience measure - and in the case of TV it is average daily and not monthly.

Next story loading loading..