Tulsi Gabbard Loses First Amendment Lawsuit Against Google

Siding with Google, a federal judge has thrown out Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard's free-speech lawsuit against the tech company over a brief suspension of her advertising account.

In a decision issued Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Wilson in the Central District of California ruled that Gabbard, a House member from Hawaii, has no valid claim that Google violated the First Amendment, given that Google is a private company.

“Google is not now, nor (to the Court’s knowledge) has it ever been, an arm of the United States government,” Wilson wrote. He dismissed the complaint with prejudice, meaning that Gabbard can't attempt to reformulate her claims and bring them again.

The decision stems from a lawsuit brought against Google last July by Gabbard's campaign, which alleged that her Google Ads account was suspended for several hours on June 28 -- two days after she participated in a debate with other Democratic hopefuls.



Gabbard's campaign alleged that the suspension violated her free speech rights.

Google argued in court that the lawsuit should be dismissed on the grounds that the company isn't the government, and therefore isn't bound by the First Amendment's prohibition on censoring political speech. The company also said the suspension occurred after its automated anti-fraud systems flagged unusual activity, and not for any political reasons.

Gabbard's campaign attempted to argue that Google should be considered a “state actor” -- meaning equivalent to the government -- and subject to the same First Amendment rules as the government, due to its role in accepting and verifying election ads.

Wilson rejected that argument, writing that Gabbard had not established how Google's control over its platform was equivalent to government regulation.

“Google does not hold primaries, it does not select candidates, and it does not prevent anyone from running for office or voting in elections,” Wilson wrote. “To the extent Google 'regulates' anything, it regulates its own private speech and platform.”

Numerous other judges have dismissed lawsuits accusing tech platforms of violating the First Amendment by “censoring” speech. Most recently, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that Prager University had no grounds to proceed with a lawsuit accusing Google of censoring conservative clips on YouTube.

3 comments about "Tulsi Gabbard Loses First Amendment Lawsuit Against Google".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Frank Watson from Kangamurra Media, March 4, 2020 at 6:23 p.m.

    Our rights are measured against the government as they have the ability to prosecute - Google has a government like presence as they own nearly 90 of searches made and taking ads down is a form of prosecution

  2. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited replied, March 5, 2020 at 9:56 a.m.

    Yes, Houston, we do have problems. Monopolies, oligopolies run amok. There is a case going to the Supreme Court to protect actors like Madoff and companies that scam are on a so what scale and too bad you lost money. The WH wants negative interest rates meaning it will cost people to keep their cash in financial institutions. When even more people lose disposable income and their homes, the megopolies swoop in and buy for pennies and sell for fortunes putting more people on the streets and dying for medical care. Goal: Indentured servitude and slavery through poverty. What would you do to feed your starving children ? Would you sit on the US border trying to get in ?

  3. David Mattson from Not Ordinary Media replied, March 5, 2020 at 12:42 p.m.

    did you mean 'persecution'?

Next story loading loading..