Game Developer Jam City Settles Privacy Charges For $1.4M

App developer Jam City has agreed to pay $1.4 million to settle charges that it violated California privacy law by not offering opt-out mechanisms in its free gaming apps, and by failing to obtain affirmative consent before sharing personal data of users under 16.

Jam City, which offers Harry Potter: Hogwarts Mystery, Cookie Jam, Panda Pop and other games, allegedly collected advertising and analytics data including users' device identifiers, IP addresses, and information about in-game purchases.

The developer "discloses this consumer personal information to third-party companies for advertising and analytics," Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged in a complaint unveiled late last week.

"These companies in turn use the personal information, as well as data collected across different websites, apps, and music, podcast, and TV streaming services for cross-context behavioral advertising," Bonta's office added.

advertisement

advertisement

The complaint alleges that Jam City didn't provide an opt-out link on its website, or within any of its apps. Instead, the company allegedly said in its privacy policy that people who wanted to avoid online ad targeting could do so by sending an email to ccpaoutout@jamcity.com.

Jam City did not admit to the allegations or admit liability.

The settlement, which was granted court approval late last week, also requires the company to implement a "consumer-friendly, easy to execute opt-out process" and to refrain from collecting data from teens under 16 without opt-in consent, among other terms.

News of the deal comes around three weeks after Sling TV agreed to pay $530,000 settle charges that it failed to offer consumers a simple way to opt out of the use of their data for advertising, and failed to provide "sufficient privacy protections" for children.

1 comment about "Game Developer Jam City Settles Privacy Charges For $1.4M".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Fred Charles, May 15, 2026 at 3:42 p.m.

    After acknowledging that we violated our players privacy, we also violated our employees privacy...

    "My company has a majority shareholder company in South Korea, Net Marble. The investor is requiring all video and audio chats between HR or management and employees who are affected by a return to office to be recorded and shared with Net Marble. The new CEO they just put in place told us today that there will be a big layoff so the investor can get paid. It seems clear that if any recordings show employees are concerned, those employees will be terminated. Can Simon Sim record our conversations and lay us off if we have concerns? Can conversations taking place in the US be shared with investors in another country without the employee's consent?"

    New CEO, but same story. We may never learn.

Next story loading loading..