
Omnicom Group CEO John Wren took a 2% cut in total
compensation in 2015, according to the company’s latest Proxy Statement filed with the SEC late Thursday.
The firm — holding company for numerous advertising and marketing
shops, including BBDO, DDB, OMD and PHD — issued its 2016 proxy statement in advance of the company’s upcoming annual meeting, to be held May 24 at Zimmerman Advertising in Fort
Lauderdale, Fla.
Still, Wren had a nice year with total compensation of $23,576,047 — which was only down about $500,000 from his total take in 2014.
Like other CEOs
in the sector, Wren’s compensation is primarily performance-based. His annual salary last year was $1 million, unchanged from the year before.
Metrics used to calculate his bonuses and
stock grants include organic revenue growth, as well as profit margin and earnings per share growth. How the company’s growth (or lack of it) compares to competitors is also a factor in
determining Wren’s total compensation.
Omnicom’s organic growth was 5.3% last year, while margins were flat and eps was up around 4%.
Omnicom’s filing followed that of
Interpublic Group’s earlier this week, which indicated that IPG CEO Michael
Roth received a 12% bump in total compensation last year to nearly $14.5 million.
Omnicom’s proxy led off with a letter from the company’s new lead independent director, Leonard
Coleman, who reported some changes regarding the makeup of the company’s board. Those changes were driven in part by a shareholder resolution last year (which has been resubmitted this year)
that would require future Chairmen of the Board to be independent board members.
Current chairman Bruce Crawford, 87, is considered an insider, given his long association with the company
including his tenure as CEO prior to Wren.
Last year’s proposal drew 54% support of voted shares, although Coleman reported that the current board would not adopt it. In follow-up
discussions with shareholders, Coleman wrote “what we heard from many was that their vote in favor of the shareholder proposal was not specifically about having an independent Chairman. Rather
it was a way to signal dissatisfaction on other governance matters, namely the lengthy average tenure of our directors, a lack of meaningful board refreshment and the implications these factors could
have on independent oversight.”
Based on that feedback, Coleman added, the Board has taken a number of steps to be responsive. Those steps include adoption of a new mandatory retirement
policy for board members when they reach the age of 75. The rule takes effect at the end of 2017. Exemptions are possible, and would be explained when they are made.
That said, Coleman
reported that the new policy will result in six of the current 14 board members stepping down over the next two years, including Gary Roubos and Errol Cook, who will leave at the end of their current
terms. (The firm has just added one new board member: Deborah Kissire, 58, a former managing partner at Ernst & Young.)
The board has also adopted a so-called “proxy access”
mechanism that would allow a group of up to 20 shareholders owning a total of at least 3% of shares for at least three years to nominate a minimum of two new independent board members (but no more
than 20% of the existing board) via the annual proxy statement.
An IPG shareholder has proposed a similar mechanism to be voted on at that company’s annual meeting next month,
although the company has recommended voters oppose it, suggesting it is unneeded and would be disruptive.
Coleman also noted that the board has expanded the lead independent director’s
duties — that is, his current role — making them largely equivalent to responsibilities “typically associated with the role of Chairman.” Among other duties, he will be on
the governance committee, participate in succession planning and preside at all board meetings where Crawford is not present.
Once again this year, the Office of Controller of the City of New
York has weighed in with a proposal to require Omnicom to make public its filings with the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, which provide a breakdown of its workforce by race and gender
according to 10 employment categories.
The proposal has been voted down several times in the past and the company noted that it publishes a separate but similar set of diversity statistics on
its Web site.