
In the
not-too-distant future, almost all video consumption will be streamed, but what the video marketplace looks like for consumers, media companies and marketers, remains up in the air.
A
number of speakers and attendees at Future plc’s Next TV Summit last week highlighted the incredible opportunity this shift to internet-delivered video presents, as well as some of the problems
that could arise as companies jockey for consumer market share and advertising revenue.
At the heart of streaming’s future is the question of commercials.
Netflix
dominates the long-form video space and it has no ads. CBS All Access and Hulu both offer tiers with almost no advertising. What does that bode for the space?
“It feels like
consumers have gotten so used to not having commercials, not watching ads, watching what they want when they want, but someone still has to foot the bill,” said Bank of America analyst Jessica
Reif. “If you are not paying for the content directly, advertising has to be a part of that.”
One possible solution: unique advertising and sponsorship propositions.
“The big challenge is how do you incorporate advertising and sponsorship into services where people don’t want to watch commercials?” asked Clint Stinchcomb, president and
CEO of the streaming video service CuriosityStream. “You will never see a program [on our service] broken up by commercials,” he added. His company has signed sponsors that are exclusive
to their verticals, with pre-rolls before shows start, but none during the program itself.
In addition, more advanced targeting could raise CPMs on streaming services, potentially
building on existing ad revenue streams.
Of course, in order to have a real ad business, you need to have consumers watching the content. That in itself poses a problem, as just a
few streaming video services can raise the monthly cost of entertainment quite high.
“There’s a danger of this marketplace becoming proliferated with a whole bunch of
software chiclets that you have to buy 40 of at $10 to $20 a piece to assemble something that looks like what you used to have [with a cable subscription],” said NCTA CEO Michael
Powell.
Virtual multichannel video providers (vMVPDs) are trying to mitigate sticker shock from their existing subscribers and potential new customers.
“We, just like others in the vMVPD category, have to toe the line against offering a sustainable business and being up against rate increases and the cost of running a service like
this. We have the same sort of pressures as others do in the space,” said Michael Keyserling, COO of the vMVPD Philo.
“We are fans of the bundle. In some cases, the idea that the
bundle is dead is overblown. What people are frustrated with is paying $150 for TV, the steadily rising rates,” he added.
One solution is to build a better product.
Content may be king, but traditional bundles were simply not the most efficient way to deliver that content.
“What we will witness over the next 10 years is the slow and
steady, but unstoppable, migration from channels to menus,” said CuriosityStream founder John Hendricks.” We are going to shift to this more superior way to watch TV.”
“At the end of the day, what is going to win in this space -- people really want a better TV product. The ones that do that will lead the way forward,” Keyserling said.