Commentary

ESPN+ A Plus To Some - Replacement For The Mothership? The Good, The Bad, The Benched

If it wasn't for the Disney bundle -- that is, subscribers buying two or three streaming platforms (Disney+, Hulu (SVOD), or ESPN+) -- ESPN+, the sports streaming TV platform, would be -- to coin a phrase -- pretty much left on the bench.

MoffettNathanson Research says “stand-alone” U.S./Canada subscribers for ESPN+ only amount to 5.3 million. But adding in streaming packaging with Disney+ and/or Hulu boosted that number much higher -- to 25.3 million. By contrast, Disney+ has 24.9 million stand-alone subscribers, while and Hulu has 22.3 million stand-alones. Disney+ -- through all bundling combinations -- has an overall U.S./Canada bundle of 46.3 million, while Hulu (as a SVOD) comes in at 43.7 million.

For that reason, Michael Nathanson, co-founder and senior research analyst of MoffettNathanson Research, says ESPN+ is entirely dependent on the bundle for its streaming success: “We believe that a sports-only streaming app is a tough model and that sports integrated in a general entertainment service a la Peacock or Paramount+makes more sense as long as that ‘cheating’ does not risk punishment by MVPDs.”

advertisement

advertisement

Although they are smaller in size -- at least in terms of streaming minutes -- Paramount+ and Peacock include sports, especially the NFL. With Disney's bundle you have a choice (as well as that of adding in a somewhat differentiated content from Hulu).

But there is something else to consider -- ESPN has much more overall sports programming: live telecasts, highlights and otherwise. 

And there is the obvious thing: ESPN+ is not ESPN. The former doesn't have all the more valuable live programming like that of its legacy cable TV network cousin. 

ESPN describes ESPN+ this way: ”ESPN+ has thousands of exclusive live events, original studio shows, and acclaimed series that aren't on the ESPN networks.”

Yes. And not exactly.

ESPN adds this: “An ESPN+ subscription does not give you access to stream ESPN's traditional TV networks or the content on them. To stream those networks you need a television subscription through a cable, satellite or digital provider.”/

So you need both legacy ESPN and streaming to get the complete sports picture? Well, that might explain a lot.

2 comments about "ESPN+ A Plus To Some - Replacement For The Mothership? The Good, The Bad, The Benched".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Ben B from Retired, June 21, 2023 at 8:38 p.m.

    ESPN+ is largely for those that can't get enough soccer & UFC PPVs and ESPN claims in the earnings how great the service is with the big UFC cards which are built in to begin with, along with hardcore NHL fans as well.

  2. T Bo from Wordpress, June 22, 2023 at 11:25 a.m.

    I missed a few hockey games, which bugged me, but I pay enough for sports through the cable bundle such that I don't want to pay more for ESPN+.

Next story loading loading..