Commentary

Google Cracks Down On SEO Ranking Abuse

Google keeps its spam policy updated. This time, the goal is to target websites hosting content intended to take advantage of site ranking, especially after earlier this year it launched a method to combat site reputation abuse.

That's where third-party content is published on a host site in an attempt to take advantage of the host's already established ranking signals. The goal of this strategy is for content to rank better than it would otherwise on a different site. Since launching the policy, these instances have been reviewed and failed. 

The use of artificial intelligence may only make this situation more complex with greater frequency.

Policies with varying degrees of first-party involvement include cooperation with white-label services, licensing agreements, partial ownership agreements, and other complex business arrangements.

advertisement

advertisement

Google's evaluation of these types of situations has shown that "no amount of first-party involvement alters the fundamental third-party nature of the content or the unfair, exploitative nature of attempting to take advantage of the host's sites ranking signals," Chris Nelson of Google’s search quality team wrote in a blog post. 

“We’re making it clear that using third-party content on a site in an attempt to exploit the site’s ranking signals is a violation of this policy -- regardless of whether there is first-party involvement or oversight of the content,” he wrote.

The policy enforcement requires manual action. It has not yet been automated using AI, Nelson explained.

Violators will be notified through their registered Search Console and can submit a reconsideration request. 

Publishers have had to explain why there is spam on otherwise reputable sites. A list of site reputation abuse can be found here.

Sports Illustrated in November 2023 had to explain to Google when it was caught publishing AI-generated product recommendations on a separate part of its website. The recommendations were written by fake AI authors, according to The Futurism.

"There was nothing in Drew Ortiz's author biography at Sports Illustrated to suggest that he was anything other than human," The Futurism reported. The "author" Ortiz did not exist. He has no social media presence and no publishing history. To add to the weird situation, his picture is for sale.

Nelson believes it is important to note that not all third-party content violates Google's policy. And aside from the third-party policies, Google has systems and methods designed to understand whether a section of a site is independent or starkly different from the main content of the site, similar to the Sports Illustrated example.

"By treating these areas as if they are standalone sites, it better ensures a level playing field, so that sub-sections of sites don't get a ranking boost just because of the reputation of the main site," he wrote. "As we continue to work to improve these systems, this helps us deliver the most useful information from a range of sites."

Next story loading loading..