TV ratings giant Nielsen is getting 2009 off on an awkward foot, disclosing a major technical snafu to clients Wednesday that has caused at least several days of delays for virtually all of its major
TV ratings services. The glitch, which was caused by the relocation of the mainframe computing system used to process all its national and local TV ratings, occurred despite a $1 million premium
Nielsen paid to the technology provider hired to handle the transition.
Details of the gaffe were outlined in a letter sent by Nielsen Executive Vice President-Global Business Services
Mitchell Habib to clients, as well as at least half a dozen separate communiqués from individual Nielsen service units on Wednesday.
Habib described the event as a "significant system
disruption," but added that Nielsen technicians have been working aggressively to fix the problem and that they believe it had been resolved as of Wednesday morning.
The problem, which occurred
when Nielsen relocated its mainframe computing system to a new facility in Plano, Texas from its an older one in Oldsmar, FL, triggered a "series of technical issues" that made it impossible for
Nielsen to retrieve data necessary to process its ratings.
advertisement
advertisement
Ratings affected by the glitch included:
* Local Overnight Data
* Fast Affiliates Data
* Fast Nationals
*
National Broadcast and Cable Overnight and Weekly Data
* Live+7 Data
Habib said Nielsen planned extensively for the transition and hired an "industry-leading technology partner" that was
paid a "premium of $1 million over the standard fee to have them focus additional resources on this project to ensure a high quality and timely transition. We took these extra steps in order to avoid
any impact on clients."
A Nielsen spokesman said that while the core problems have been resolved, it make take until Jan. 12th to process the remaining delayed data.
"I've never seen a day
like this," said one Nielsen client after receiving his ninth in a series of related ratings delay notices.
The client, who requested anonymity, said his main concern was that Nielsen had not
advised clients of the relocation - and the potential risk of dislocation that might occur from it - beforehand, so that they could have been prepared for a snafu should it occur.
"It's fine for
Nielsen to invoke the term of 'continuous improvement' in these matters, but to its clients, it looks more like continuous chaos," he said.
A Nielsen spokesman said it did not issue a broad
client communication about the mainframe system relocation because it believed it had taken the steps necessary to ensure it would be "seamless to client."